why to write here on the list ?
simply is a problem rom your script (file overwrite) or nist file could be
dirty.
I hate automatic update special each day specia for roots inside dns (they
change one time every twenty years ... if is a change).
I don't kno nist file, I ever used internic for
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017, Stefan Sticht wrote:
since a couple of weeks i repeatedly see this in all my nameserver logs:
Sep 8 12:12:56 ns-01 named[17926]: checkhints: view “internal”:
b.root-servers.net/ (2001:500:200::b) extra record in hints
Sep 8 12:13:03 ns-01 named[17926]: checkhints: view
> On Sep 9, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Stefan Sticht wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> since a couple of weeks i repeatedly see this in all my nameserver logs:
>
> Sep 8 12:12:56 ns-01 named[17926]: checkhints: view “internal”:
> b.root-servers.net/ (2001:500:200::b) extra record in hints
> Sep 8 12:13:03 ns-
re is right address.
From: bind-users on behalf of Suzanne Woolf
Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2017 8:11 PM
To: Stefan Sticht
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: checkhints: view “internal”: b.root-servers.net/AAAA
(2001:500:200::b) extra record in hints
Hi,
thanks for all the suggestions.
I have no forwarders configured.
I started downloading and using the hints file from
ftp://FTP.INTERNIC.NET/domain/named.cache shortly after I noticed the problem.
# grep B.ROOT /var/named/named.ca
.360 NSB.ROOT-SERVERS.NE
I suspect that you are forwarding your queries and that your forwarder is
returning out-of-date addresses.
In message
,
Alberto Colosi writes:
> I haven't seen as from a while I have no servers to admin
>
> as I ever say to who I teach ... right source for right content. nist o=
> k but .
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017, Mark Andrews wrote:
I suspect that you are forwarding your queries and that your forwarder is
returning out-of-date addresses.
No forwarding here.
Jay Ford, Network Engineering Group, Information Te
The most sensible thing to do is ignore the message, and keep named
reasonably up-to-date.
I used to maintain a local hints file with a script that periodically
downloads and updates it (from internic or the DNS), reconfiguring named
when it changes. It works well - but it's really not worth the
In message , Timothe Litt writes:
> The most sensible thing to do is ignore the message, and keep named
> reasonably up-to-date.
Well something in the resolution path is changing the answer to
return the old address which is why I suggested that there may
be a forwarder involved. One should
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message , Timothe Litt
> writes:
>> The most sensible thing to do is ignore the message, and keep named
>> reasonably up-to-date.
>
> Well something in the resolution path is changing the answer to
> return the old address which is
10 matches
Mail list logo
