Re: faster fail-over between multiple masters

2011-08-31 Thread Klaus Darilion
Hi Michael! Am 30.08.2011 20:33, schrieb Michael Graff: > On 2011-08-30 12:06 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: > >> Unfortunately I fail to find the options where I can configure the >> number of retransmissions, timeouts and number of transactions - >> please give me some hints. > > I don't believe t

Re: faster fail-over between multiple masters

2011-08-30 Thread Michael Graff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-30 12:06 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: > Unfortunately I fail to find the options where I can configure the > number of retransmissions, timeouts and number of transactions - > please give me some hints. I don't believe there are external kno

Re: faster fail-over between multiple masters

2011-08-30 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 30.08.2011 18:17, schrieb Klaus Darilion: > 2. Thus, every 4.5 minutes the slave asks both masters for the serial. > The lookup to M1 works fine, the lookup to M2 of course fails as M2 is > down and thus bind starts with retransmissions: every lookup has 2 > retransmissions every 15 seconds, t

Re: faster fail-over between multiple masters

2011-08-30 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 30.08.2011 00:04, schrieb Mark Andrews: > In message <4e5b6098.80...@pernau.at>, Klaus Darilion writes: >> Hi! >> >> I have 9.7.0-P1 as slave configured with two masters: M1 and M2. M2 is >> currently down. >> >> When M1 sends a NOTIFY to inform the salve of the new zone, bind starts >> queryi

Re: faster fail-over between multiple masters

2011-08-29 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4e5b6098.80...@pernau.at>, Klaus Darilion writes: > Hi! > > I have 9.7.0-P1 as slave configured with two masters: M1 and M2. M2 is > currently down. > > When M1 sends a NOTIFY to inform the salve of the new zone, bind starts > querying for the SOA record at M2. As M2 is down, bind se