Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-11 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4afa0555.6070...@cyzap.com>, Raj Adhikari writes: > Kevin Wrote: {QUOTE} There is no "BIND way" versus "Windows way". For a > range smaller than /24 you either need to host all the records in the > /24 zone, delegate each entry individually (as /32 zones), or use > CNAMEs. This is dete

Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Raj Adhikari wrote: >> Thanks Chris for the reply. >> Actually, let me put my question the other way. >> How can one delegate the classless subnet to other DNS? >> Actually, one of our ISP could not delegate classless subnet to our >> server ns1.cyzap.net. I am trying to help them in delegating t

Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-10 Thread Raj Adhikari
Kevin Wrote: {QUOTE} There is no "BIND way" versus "Windows way". For a range smaller than /24 you either need to host all the records in the /24 zone, delegate each entry individually (as /32 zones), or use CNAMEs. This is determined by the protocol, regardless of whether you're using Microsoft DN

Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-10 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4af9dfba.6040...@cyzap.com>, Raj Adhikari writes: > Thanks Chris for the reply. > Actually, let me put my question the other way. > How can one delegate the classless subnet to other DNS? > Actually, one of our ISP could not delegate classless subnet to our > server ns1.cyzap.net. I am

Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-10 Thread Kevin Darcy
Raj Adhikari wrote: Yes, they both are non-BIND servers, actually using Windows DNS servers. I have delegated *each*in-addr*arpa*name* from cyzap to monetreeysystems. Nope. $ dig -x 63.254.134.228 soa @ns1.moneytreesystems.com ; <<>> DiG 9.3.5-P2 <<>> -x 63.254.134.228 soa @ns1.moneytreesys

Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-10 Thread Kevin Darcy
Raj Adhikari wrote: Thanks Chris for the reply. Actually, let me put my question the other way. How can one delegate the classless subnet to other DNS? Actually, one of our ISP could not delegate classless subnet to our server ns1.cyzap.net. I am trying to help them in delegating the classless su

Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-10 Thread Sven Eschenberg
Hi Raj, You could CNAME the needed entries to a new zone, which is then delegated. AFAIK DNAME should be possible too. Regards -Sven Raj Adhikari schrieb: Thanks Chris for the reply. Actually, let me put my question the other way. How can one delegate the classless subnet to other DNS? Act

Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-10 Thread Raj Adhikari
Yes, they both are non-BIND servers, actually using Windows DNS servers. I have delegated *each*in-addr*arpa*name* from cyzap to monetreeysystems. But haven't tried again each separate zone on moneytreesystems. I tried RFC 2317 also. But again sometimes it just stuck at CNAME and sometimes no answe

Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-10 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4af9a220.9070...@cyzap.com>, Raj Adhikari writes: > Hi Guys, > I have a 63.254.134.224/28 delegated from ns1.cyzap.net to > ns1.moneytreesystems.com. The dig with trace only shows the PTR record. > Surprisingly, it starts acting normal after I do the dig on > ns1.cyzap.net. See the dig

Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-10 Thread Raj Adhikari
Thanks Chris for the reply. Actually, let me put my question the other way. How can one delegate the classless subnet to other DNS? Actually, one of our ISP could not delegate classless subnet to our server ns1.cyzap.net. I am trying to help them in delegating the classless subnet to us. So this sc

Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-10 Thread Kevin Darcy
It's worse than that. Sometimes RD doesn't even get copied into the response header. I suspect there's a load-balancer in front here, and at least one "bad", non-BIND nameserver behind it, spewing out nasty stuff like "horizontal" delegations... Either that, or some middlebox is munging the

Re: Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-10 Thread Chris Hills
On 10/11/09 18:25, Raj Adhikari wrote: Now I can do a dig for an hour or so. But again I run into same problem. It wont return PTR record unless I explicitly do dig on ns1.cyzap.net. Also, the last did showing ns1.cyzap.net as Authority NS for this IP. But trace showing ns1.moneytreesystems.com a

Reverse DNS Dig returning PTR results only with trace option

2009-11-10 Thread Raj Adhikari
Hi Guys, I have a 63.254.134.224/28 delegated from ns1.cyzap.net to ns1.moneytreesystems.com. The dig with trace only shows the PTR record. Surprisingly, it starts acting normal after I do the dig on ns1.cyzap.net. See the dig output below. Here is the output: Simple dig to 63.254.234.228. $ dig -