Karl Auer wrote on 12/05/2012 06:44:01 PM:
> This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be
> supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no
> entry in the DNS.
THe SPF query is looking for the sender's domain, not the sender's server,
so the record woul
Dan Mahoney wrote on 12/05/2012 06:52:43 PM:
> I can't even imagine what spamfilters would think of such an address. :)
To quotes some annoying TV ads here in the US:
"REJECTED!"
Confidentiality Notice:
This electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential or
privile
In message , Dan Mahoney w
rites:
>
>
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Karl Auer wrote:
>
> > This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be
> > supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no
> > entry in the DNS.
>
> Well, most mail servers will reject such a ser
In article ,
Karl Auer wrote:
> This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be
> supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no
> entry in the DNS.
Many anti-spam rules block mail from servers with no reverse DNS, so it
seems pointless to have SPF recor
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Karl Auer wrote:
> This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be
> supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no
> entry in the DNS.
Well, most mail servers will reject such a server (i.e. one with NO rdns).
However, there's anoth
This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be
supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no
entry in the DNS.
Regards, K.
--
~~~
Karl Auer (ka...@biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.
6 matches
Mail list logo
