Of course a dig query will fail without the domain appended. Dig takes
you query at face value and will not append domains from your search
suffix list like nslookup and ping will. You ALWAYS have to fully qualify
your requests when using dig.
Chris.
On 12-08-15 3:29 PM, wbr...@e1b.org
On 16 Aug 2012, at 15:42, Christopher Cain wrote:
Of course a dig query will fail without the domain appended. Dig takes
you query at face value and will not append domains from your search
suffix list like nslookup and ping will. You ALWAYS have to fully qualify
your requests when using
Hello,
I hope this is the right list.. I am using bind 9.8.2on centos 6 with a
system called openims. I am trying to get my bind server to respond to an
SRV query of _sip._udp where the query has no domain. I am told by the
openims folks that I should be able to get my bind to respond but I have
On 15/08/12 15:42, Thomas Secula wrote:
Hello,
I hope this is the right list.. I am using bind 9.8.2on centos 6 with a
system called openims. I am trying to get my bind server to respond to
an SRV query of _sip._udp where the query has no domain.
Yuck. That's horrible. Are you *sure* that's
In message cae6g+hspffba0edc1b3wis__ap_ruenwpsb_2hyvqrerdis...@mail.gmail.com
, Thomas Secula writes:
Hello,
I hope this is the right list.. I am using bind 9.8.2on centos 6 with a
system called openims. I am trying to get my bind server to respond to an
SRV query of _sip._udp where the
There's no point in answering a domain-less SRV-record query, since
the whole point of the SRV record type is to allow clients to find
resources associated with a particular domain (and protocol/transport).
You need to set the proper domain on the client doing the lookup.
- Kevin
.
I don't believe this is a bind issue as I would expect the P-CSCF to get
that NXDOMAIN and be able to handle it, likely an openims bug.
thanks for all your replies!!!1
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote:
There's no point in answering a domain-less SRV-record
.
thanks for all your replies!!!1
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote:
There's no point in answering a domain-less SRV-record query, since
the whole point of the SRV record type is to allow clients to find
resources associated with a particular domain
kevin wrote on 08/15/2012 12:52:18 PM:
I don't believe SRV lookups use the search directive in /etc/
resolv.conf; I think that's only for A (name-to-address) lookups.
But I could be wrong on that...
Using host I was able to do a search for _sip._tcp for the search domain
on my system
9 matches
Mail list logo
