Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-05-05 Thread Sam Wilson
In article , Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:35:38AM +0100, > Sam Wilson wrote > a message of 22 lines which said: > > > > It seems (not tested by me) that Nominum CNS does that: when many > > > responses arrive which do not match (src IP address, query ID, etc) > >

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-05-05 Thread Sam Wilson
In article , sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > > > > I know of no such feature. What do you mean by "spoofed" anyway? How > > > > would you expect named to detect "spoofing", and is that its job? > > > > > > It seems (not tested by me) that Nominum CNS does that: when many > > > responses arrive which

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-05-05 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:35:38AM +0100, Sam Wilson wrote a message of 22 lines which said: > > It seems (not tested by me) that Nominum CNS does that: when many > > responses arrive which do not match (src IP address, query ID, etc) > > any pending answer, it switches to TCP, assuming someon

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-05-05 Thread sthaug
> > > I know of no such feature. What do you mean by "spoofed" anyway? How > > > would you expect named to detect "spoofing", and is that its job? > > > > It seems (not tested by me) that Nominum CNS does that: when many > > responses arrive which do not match (src IP address, query ID, etc) > > a

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-05-05 Thread Sam Wilson
In article , Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:59:11AM -0400, > Kevin Darcy wrote > a message of 21 lines which said: > > > I know of no such feature. What do you mean by "spoofed" anyway? How > > would you expect named to detect "spoofing", and is that its job? > > I

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-04-30 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:59:11AM -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote a message of 21 lines which said: > I know of no such feature. What do you mean by "spoofed" anyway? How > would you expect named to detect "spoofing", and is that its job? It seems (not tested by me) that Nominum CNS does that: when

Re: Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-04-28 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 4/28/2010 6:22 AM, kalpesh varyani wrote: Hi all, Please let me know if there is some feature in any of the versions of BIND, by which it switches to TCP when it detects spoofed replies. I am aware that BIND uses UDP for all its query / response and TCP for zone transfers. I know

Switching to TCP in BIND.

2010-04-28 Thread kalpesh varyani
Hi all, Please let me know if there is some feature in any of the versions of BIND, by which it switches to TCP when it detects spoofed replies. I am aware that BIND uses UDP for all its query / response and TCP for zone transfers. Regards, Kalpesh __