Hi Jeff,
Did I misread your original problem? I thought you said it worked if
you had only one of the nameservers in resolv.conf. You didn't state
but I assume (that word again) that you meant if either of your
nameservers was there by itself it worked?
No, you did not misread the problem;
In article mailman.1200.1271623889.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
James Roberts-Thomson james.robertsthomson...@msd.govt.nz wrote:
However, I'm not sure why it was working when only one nameserver was
specified if the server wouldn't allow recursion in the first place. The
nameservers are
-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Unexpected issues with nslookup command
Hi Mark,
allow-recursion defaults to { localnets; localhost; };.
If the client was not on a directly connected network it
will NOT get recursion by default.
So it would seem; I had made an assumption about subnetting
In message ff38bba1bf42ab46a7f46524614fab62024c1...@exvs02.dsw.net, Lightner
, Jeff writes:
Did I misread your original problem? I thought you said it worked if
you had only one of the nameservers in resolv.conf. You didn't state
but I assume (that word again) that you meant if either of
Hello,
I have tried to research my problem, but haven't found an answer from the
collected Google wisdom of the ages, unfortunately.
We have a situation where we are getting strange results from the nslookup
command (with knock-on effects to name resolution in general).
We have two primary
In message 9b2fff1719120e4c83de53c2f70cc60755d5899...@secmclust01a.corp.ssi.go
vt.nz, James Roberts-Thomson writes:
Can anyone explain what may be happening here, please?
Stub resolvers really should be talking to nameservers that offer
recursion. If it is talking to a nameserver that doesn't
In message 9b2fff1719120e4c83de53c2f70cc60755d5899...@secmclust01a.corp.ssi.go
vt.nz, James Roberts-Thomson writes:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your response; whilst I accept what your saying, I'm not convinced
it applies in this case.
As far as I can tell, recursion is enabled on the servers.
Hi Mark,
allow-recursion defaults to { localnets; localhost; };.
If the client was not on a directly connected network it
will NOT get recursion by default.
So it would seem; I had made an assumption about subnetting that apparently was
not entirely accurate. Oh well, you know what they say
8 matches
Mail list logo
