Re: Version statement...

2012-08-20 Thread Tony Finch
sth...@nethelp.no sth...@nethelp.no wrote: I have since learned that you get different version output from dig, named -v, and a dns query and the version statement only affects specific outputs. What is the difference between using dig and a DNS query? Dig reports its own version number

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-19 Thread Jeff Justice
Jeremy, it is exactly as you asked. Apparently the real version is displayed using certain commands, and the user-defined version is displayed in other places. I have since learned that you get different version output from dig, named -v, and a dns query and the version statement only affects

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-19 Thread Mark Elkins
? Jeff On Aug 17, 2012, at 9:02 PM, Michael Hoskins (michoski) micho...@cisco.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Jeff Justice listacco...@starionline.com Date: Friday, August 17, 2012 6:10 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Version

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-19 Thread sthaug
I have since learned that you get different version output from dig, named -v, and a dns query and the version statement only affects specific outputs. What is the difference between using dig and a DNS query? I expect the same result from using dig to query for version.bind chaos txt

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-19 Thread Mark Andrews
different version output from dig, named -v , and a dns query and the version statement only affects specific outputs. S o it depends on how it's queried. That doesn't seem clear in the documentati on unless I missed it...thus my confusion. I really don't know what is unclear about what version does

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-18 Thread btb
On Aug 17, 2012, at 22.02, Michael Hoskins (michoski) wrote: -Original Message- From: Jeff Justice listacco...@starionline.com Date: Friday, August 17, 2012 6:10 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Version statement... Okay, here's what I know

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-18 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
How are you testing it? Where do you see the wrong version? ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-17 Thread Michael Hoskins (michoski)
: Jeff Justice listacco...@starionline.com Date: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:53 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Version statement... Doesn't seem to work with or without the brackets. Does it matter what order it appears in the options list? Or a limit

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-17 Thread Carsten Strotmann
Jeff Justice listacco...@starionline.com writes: Hi Jeff, I am trying to mask our DNS servers version output to a custom string, but it doesn't seem to be working for me. In a nutshell, I have added this to my options block of my named.conf: version [DNS Server]; But when I do a

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-17 Thread Jeff Justice
Okay, here's what I know: named-checkconf says there are no errors. There is only one named process running. When I apply my edited named.conf, the log shows named stopping and restarting with no errors. How can I check to see the path where my named process thinks named.conf is located? Jeff

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-17 Thread Michael Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Jeff Justice listacco...@starionline.com Date: Friday, August 17, 2012 6:10 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Version statement... Okay, here's what I know: named-checkconf says there are no errors. There is only one named

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-17 Thread Jeff Justice
...@cisco.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Jeff Justice listacco...@starionline.com Date: Friday, August 17, 2012 6:10 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Version statement... Okay, here's what I know: named-checkconf says there are no errors

Version statement...

2012-08-16 Thread Jeff Justice
I am trying to mask our DNS servers version output to a custom string, but it doesn't seem to be working for me. In a nutshell, I have added this to my options block of my named.conf: version [DNS Server]; But when I do a query, it still shows the actual version number i.e. BIND 9.9.1-P2,

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-16 Thread David Miller
On 8/17/2012 1:13 AM, Jeff Justice wrote: I am trying to mask our DNS servers version output to a custom string, but it doesn't seem to be working for me. In a nutshell, I have added this to my options block of my named.conf: version [DNS Server]; options { version string;

Re: Version statement...

2012-08-16 Thread Jeff Justice
Doesn't seem to work with or without the brackets. Does it matter what order it appears in the options list? Or a limit on number of characters? Jeff On Aug 17, 2012, at 12:34 AM, David Miller dmil...@tiggee.com wrote: On 8/17/2012 1:13 AM, Jeff Justice wrote: I am trying to mask our DNS