Re: are you using lwres?

2017-05-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.05.2017 um 14:26 schrieb G.W. Haywood: On Fri, 19 May 2017, Evan Hunt wrote: Do you run lwresd or named-with-lwres? Do you have code that links with liblwres? If so, please let me know. 8<-- mail6:~# >>> cat /etc/de

Re: are you using lwres?

2017-05-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 18.05.17 21:13, Evan Hunt wrote: At ISC we've recently been discussing the idea of deprecating the lightweight resolver interface as of BIND 9.12. This means removing lwresd and liblwres, and deprecating the lwres statement in named.conf. (Note that they would remain available in earlier rele

Re: are you using lwres?

2017-05-19 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Fri, 19 May 2017, Evan Hunt wrote: Do you run lwresd or named-with-lwres? Do you have code that links with liblwres? If so, please let me know. 8<-- mail6:~# >>> cat /etc/debian_version 8.7 mail6:~# >>> apt-get

Re: are you using lwres?

2017-05-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.05.2017 um 23:13 schrieb Evan Hunt: Greetings, At ISC we've recently been discussing the idea of deprecating the lightweight resolver interface as of BIND 9.12. This means removing lwresd and liblwres, and deprecating the lwres statement in named.conf. (Note that they would remain avail

are you using lwres?

2017-05-18 Thread Evan Hunt
Greetings, At ISC we've recently been discussing the idea of deprecating the lightweight resolver interface as of BIND 9.12. This means removing lwresd and liblwres, and deprecating the lwres statement in named.conf. (Note that they would remain available in earlier releases; BIND 9.11 will be su