Re: bind version problem

2011-07-19 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
> If Bind version of primary dns is "bind-libs-9.3.6-16.P1.el5" and for > secondary dns "bind-9.5.0-29.b2.fc9.i386". Something wrong there: "libs" vs. "server", but I assume you mean server for both. > Is it mandatory the same version for > primary and secondary DNS. Not unless you rely on a pa

Re: bind version problem

2011-07-19 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 08:30:17PM +0600, almah...@ranksitt.net wrote a message of 18 lines which said: > Is it mandatory the same version for primary and secondary DNS. It is not even mandatory for all the authoritative name servers to run BIND. They can be of different brands. That's the be

Re: bind version problem

2011-07-19 Thread Daniel McDonald
On 7/19/11 9:30 AM, "almah...@ranksitt.net" wrote: > Hi, > > If Bind version of primary dns is "bind-libs-9.3.6-16.P1.el5" and for > secondary dns "bind-9.5.0-29.b2.fc9.i386". > > Is there create any problem?? In general, it creates no problem. If you happen to use an RR for which support wa

bind version problem

2011-07-19 Thread almahmud
Hi, If Bind version of primary dns is "bind-libs-9.3.6-16.P1.el5" and for secondary dns "bind-9.5.0-29.b2.fc9.i386". Is there create any problem?? Is it mandatory the same version for primary and secondary DNS. Regards - Mahmud ___ Please visit htt