Re: thank you - Re: bind9 (9.18.14) build / install on macOS Ventura (13.3.1) fails to create dirs or files as expected

2023-05-30 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
You are most welcome, I'm glad you got it running. Now the fun starts! :D Greg On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 21:02, Pacific wrote: > Thank you and to everyone who took the time to respond. Your collective > input did the trick and I now have bind running successfully through a brew > install. > > I

thank you - Re: bind9 (9.18.14) build / install on macOS Ventura (13.3.1) fails to create dirs or files as expected

2023-05-30 Thread Pacific
Thank you and to everyone who took the time to respond. Your collective input did the trick and I now have bind running successfully through a brew install. I got pulled into another project and wanted to reply with thanks sooner. Your time is valuable and I sincerely appreciate everyone who

Re: bind9 (9.18.14) build / install on macOS Ventura (13.3.1) fails to create dirs or files as expected

2023-05-24 Thread Petr Menšík
I think default configuration file is usually created by the package distributor. It depends on how you want to use your named, but for basic iterative server running just on your host, empty file is enough. Defaults work fine enough for default configuration. If you run "named -c /dev/null",

Re: bind9 (9.18.14) build / install on macOS Ventura (13.3.1) fails to create dirs or files as expected

2023-05-09 Thread Ondřej Surý
I would like to re-iterate what Greg said here - use the Homebrew package. Using the Homebrew hides some gory details about the system administrators and could be a good entry to learn how the system administration works. Otherwise, you need to look at the output that the build process produced,

Re: bind9 (9.18.14) build / install on macOS Ventura (13.3.1) fails to create dirs or files as expected

2023-05-09 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
The named binary *could* exist in many places; it depends on the OS. For example, with a Homebrew install on my Mac it's here: /usr/local/Cellar/bind/9.18.14/sbin/named because of this build parameter: --prefix=/usr/local/Cellar/bind/9.18.14 It's linked to from /usr/local/opt/bind/sbin/named, for

Re: bind9 (9.18.14) build / install on macOS Ventura (13.3.1) fails to create dirs or files as expected

2023-05-09 Thread Pacific
Hi, thanks for the reply. For some reason I thought it did install or drop a base bones named.conf file, however, it should have dropped the named binary into /usr/local — which it didn’t do. And none of the other “various BIND 9 libraries”. The bind docs at

Re: bind9 (9.18.14) build / install on macOS Ventura (13.3.1) fails to create dirs or files as expected

2023-05-09 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 09/05/2023 22:23, Pacific wrote: Hi Pacific, Installing bind9 (9.18.14) on macOS Ventura (13.3.1) — install is not creating a namedb directory nor can I find a boilerplate named.conf. As far as remember, the bind install procedure doesn't create a named.conf. -- Anand -- Visit

Re: bind9 (9.18.14) build / install on macOS Ventura (13.3.1) fails to create dirs or files as expected

2023-05-09 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hello. By far the simplest way to install BIND natively on Mac is to use the Homebrew package manager. I have 9.18.14 installed on mine and it works fine. The other alternative is to run it from the Docker image. See here for details: https://hub.docker.com/r/internetsystemsconsortium/bind9 Hope

bind9 (9.18.14) build / install on macOS Ventura (13.3.1) fails to create dirs or files as expected

2023-05-09 Thread Pacific
Installing bind9 (9.18.14) on macOS Ventura (13.3.1) — install is not creating a namedb directory nor can I find a boilerplate named.conf. Steps taken: Downloaded tar directly from isc, saved to a local directory as a user with admin privs. Steps to build: tar xzf bind-9.18.14.tar.gz cd