bind9 cache

2010-12-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
i like to have bind cache in 43200 secs for any zone and update only if soa changes in that time, how do i configure named.conf to do this ? negative cache i like to have as the zone says in ttl, so just 43200 on positive -- xpoint ___ bind-use

Re: bind9 cache

2010-12-04 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Benny Pedersen wrote: > i like to have bind cache in 43200 secs for any zone and update only > if soa changes in that time, how do i configure named.conf to do this ? > > negative cache i like to have as the zone says in ttl, so just 43200 > on positive You can't. You can con

Re: bind9 cache

2010-12-04 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20101204170822.94482eupddwii...@www.jersore.net>, Benny Pedersen wr ites: > > i like to have bind cache in 43200 secs for any zone and update only > if soa changes in that time, how do i configure named.conf to do this ? You can set a maximum bound on how long named will cache reco

Re: bind9 cache

2010-12-27 Thread Benny Pedersen
On lør 04 dec 2010 22:45:56 CET, Barry Margolin wrote You can't. You can configure a max cache time, but not a minimum. Why do you think this is a good idea? With your method, it would have to do two queries whenever a record's TTL has expired: first check the SOA to see if it has changed, th

Re: bind9 cache

2010-12-27 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20101227132531.27408gvuita79...@mail.junc.org>, Benny Pedersen writ es: > On l=F8r 04 dec 2010 22:45:56 CET, Barry Margolin wrote > > > You can't. You can configure a max cache time, but not a minimum. > > > > Why do you think this is a good idea? With your method, it would have > >

Re: bind9 cache

2010-12-29 Thread Benny Pedersen
On man 27 dec 2010 15:09:15 CET, Mark Andrews wrote You are falling foul of out of date filters. 2/8 was only allocated 2009-09 so you will still find sites that are blocking packets from / route for 2/8. post to bind-users@lists.isc.org not to bind-us...@isc.org well is there anything i can

Re: bind9 cache

2010-12-29 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20101229090538.17173t2lbw1zw...@mail.junc.org>, Benny Pedersen writ es: > On man 27 dec 2010 15:09:15 CET, Mark Andrews wrote > > You are falling foul of out of date filters. 2/8 was only allocated > > 2009-09 so you will still find sites that are blocking packets from / > > route for

list addresses (was: Re: bind9 cache)

2011-01-06 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
just FYI > In message <20101229090538.17173t2lbw1zw...@mail.junc.org>, Benny Pedersen > writes: > > post to bind-users@lists.isc.org not to bind-us...@isc.org On 30.12.10 10:02, Mark Andrews wrote: > To: Benny Pedersen > From: Mark Andrews > Subject: Re: bind9 cac