At Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:04:49 -0500,
Danny Mayer ma...@gis.net wrote:
Personally, I'm not convinced that it will make a difference outside of
Windows. The fix is to make sure a lock gets destroyed when done and the
function exits. On Windows the lock gets created and memory is allocated
for it
At Thu, 1 Jan 2009 00:47:10 -0500,
Vinny Abello vi...@tellurian.com wrote:
I just loaded up the BIND 9.5.1 port on FreeBSD 7.0 AMD64 with
threads. I don't see the prominent memory leak present on my system
any longer. I lost track of this thread and think two different
changes might have been
At Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:58:07 -0500,
Vinny Abello vi...@tellurian.com wrote:
My basic question is: Is there any advantage to compiling BIND in
the previous manner now that there is a fix in the BIND source code?
Do you mean compiling BIND with the memory leak fix and without the
FreeBSD port
Doug Barton wrote:
Vinny Abello wrote:
Just for clarification, is there any downside to this autoconf fix
vs. how it was previously working?
It was not working correctly previously, so no.
Does autoconf still not understand AMD64 on FreeBSD
You're confusing autoconf and the configure
At Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:13:10 -0800,
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
And can someone please state affirmatively that the patches to acl.c
and iptable.c do the right thing, with or without the patch to the port?
This patch completely fixed the hole in my test environment. With
this patch
, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
From: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption
To: bind-us...@isc.org bind-us...@isc.org
Date: Tuesday, December 23, 2008, 1:15 PM
JINMEI Tatuya / wrote:
At Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:35:32 -0500,
Vinny Abello vi
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:53:23 +0300,
Dmitry Rybin rybi...@post.ru wrote:
Thank's to JINMEI Tatuya for support.
I have over 40 views, defined in named.conf, max-memory for cache -
32Mb. Named daemon allocate over 2 Gb per 24 hours of work.
Each view has a
At Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:53:23 +0300,
Dmitry Rybin rybi...@post.ru wrote:
Thank's to JINMEI Tatuya for support.
I have over 40 views, defined in named.conf, max-memory for cache -
32Mb. Named daemon allocate over 2 Gb per 24 hours of work.
Each view has a separate cache DB. So if each of these
At Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:07:12 -0800,
JINMEI Tatuya jinmei_tat...@isc.org wrote:
At Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:53:23 +0300,
Dmitry Rybin rybi...@post.ru wrote:
Thank's to JINMEI Tatuya for support.
I have over 40 views, defined in named.conf, max-memory for cache -
32Mb. Named daemon allocate
Thank's to JINMEI Tatuya for support.
I have over 40 views, defined in named.conf, max-memory for cache -
32Mb. Named daemon allocate over 2 Gb per 24 hours of work.
Have you any ideas how to limit memory usage?
Dmitry Rybin wrote:
max-cache-size 64M;
# /usr/bin/limits -v 1200M
Thank's to JINMEI Tatuya for support.
I have over 40 views, defined in named.conf, max-memory for cache -
32Mb. Named daemon allocate over 2 Gb per 24 hours of work.
Have you any ideas how to limit memory usage?
Dmitry Rybin wrote:
max-cache-size 64M;
# /usr/bin/limits -v 1200M
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:25:42 +0300,
Dmitry Rybin kirg...@corbina.net wrote:
OK. I just make bind from src with ./configure --enable-threads gcc
option -static.
file /usr/local/sbin/named-test
/usr/local/sbin/named-test: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64,
OK. I just make bind from src with ./configure --enable-threads gcc
option -static.
file /usr/local/sbin/named-test
/usr/local/sbin/named-test: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
(FreeBSD), for FreeBSD 7.1 (701100), statically linked, FreeBSD-style,
not stripped
fresh system
max-cache-size 64M;
# /usr/bin/limits -v 1200M /usr/local/sbin/named-test -c
/etc/namedb/named.conf
Over 10 minutes of work and core dumped:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0058c3fc in thr_kill ()
#1 0x005c5a68 in abort ()
#2 0x00597af7 in malloc ()
#3 0x0056645a in
:
From: Dmitry Rybin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption
To: Vinny Abello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 4:05 AM
Hello
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:05:27 +0300,
Dmitry Rybin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I test patch, add to bind95/Makefile
.if (${ARCH} == amd64)
ARCH= x86_64
.endif
Future versions of BIND9 will support amd64 in its configure script to
workaround the FreeBSD
Rybin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dmitry Rybin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption
To: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, December 11, 2008, 1:50 AM
JINMEI Tatuya
At Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:50:22 +0300,
Dmitry Rybin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:05:27 +0300,
Dmitry Rybin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I test patch, add to bind95/Makefile
.if (${ARCH} == amd64)
ARCH= x86_64
.endif
Future
Hello!
I test patch, add to bind95/Makefile
.if (${ARCH} == amd64)
ARCH= x86_64
.endif
work/bind-9.5.0-P2/config.log
uname -m = amd64
/usr/bin/uname -p = amd64
Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
ISC_ARCH_DIR='x86_32'
directed to the concern of FreeBSD + amd64 platform +
FreeBSD port dns/bind95 (BIND 9.5.0-P2) + threading enabled
thanks!
--- On Wed, 12/10/08, Dmitry Rybin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dmitry Rybin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption
To: Vinny Abello [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:38 PM
To: Vinny Abello
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption
At Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:26:25 -0500,
Vinny
21 matches
Mail list logo
