Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-11 Thread Stacey Jonathan Marshall
On 03/10/10 11:59, Chris Thompson wrote: On Mar 10 2010, Sam Wilson wrote: In article , wrote: dig was added to Solaris 9. It is not native to Solaris 8 or older. That would explain why it's only where Chris found it on some of our range of Solarises (vintage or only slightly worn). Yes

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-10 Thread Chris Thompson
On Mar 10 2010, Sam Wilson wrote: In article , wrote: dig was added to Solaris 9. It is not native to Solaris 8 or older. That would explain why it's only where Chris found it on some of our range of Solarises (vintage or only slightly worn). Yes, I did overestimate how long it's been th

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-10 Thread Sam Wilson
In article , wrote: > dig was added to Solaris 9. It is not native to Solaris 8 or older. That would explain why it's only where Chris found it on some of our range of Solarises (vintage or only slightly worn). > Chris Thompson wrote: > > On Mar 9 2010, Sam Wilson wrote: > > > > ...

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
Yup! That's what I need. Thank you for all suggestion! Best Wishes! Julian ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Mark Andrews
Mark Andrews writes: > > In message <8be7886dd93c4870bd2a8a0d00259...@internal.corp.ds>, "ic.nssip" wr > it > es: > > What I'm trying to do is to find a way to get the TTL left for a cached > > record. > > I usually use dnsquery like this (12m23s and 9m53s is what interest me): > > > > # dnsqu

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <8be7886dd93c4870bd2a8a0d00259...@internal.corp.ds>, "ic.nssip" writ es: > What I'm trying to do is to find a way to get the TTL left for a cached > record. > I usually use dnsquery like this (12m23s and 9m53s is what interest me): > > # dnsquery -n 8.8.8.8 -t a ftp.funet.fi > ;; ->>

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Alan Clegg
ic.nssip wrote: > What I'm trying to do is to find a way to get the TTL left for a cached > record. > I usually use dnsquery like this (12m23s and 9m53s is what interest me): > > # dnsquery -n 8.8.8.8 -t a ftp.funet.fi > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47912 > ;; flags: qr rd r

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
What I'm trying to do is to find a way to get the TTL left for a cached record. I usually use dnsquery like this (12m23s and 9m53s is what interest me): # dnsquery -n 8.8.8.8 -t a ftp.funet.fi ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47912 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTH

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Alan Clegg
ic.nssip wrote: > I've got dnsquery working fine from sunfreeware.com bind-8.4.6 on > x86-Solaris 10. > Does anybody knows if it can be exported to another machine? I tried to > binary ftp the file to another machine (same configuration), I fixed > owner and permissions but will just not run there.

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
I've got dnsquery working fine from sunfreeware.com bind-8.4.6 on x86-Solaris 10. Does anybody knows if it can be exported to another machine? I tried to binary ftp the file to another machine (same configuration), I fixed owner and permissions but will just not run there. Does it has some depen

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread jcarroll65
dig was added to Solaris 9. It is not native to Solaris 8 or older. Chris Thompson wrote: > On Mar 9 2010, Sam Wilson wrote: > > >In article , > > "ic.nssip" wrote: > > > >> I find it useful to test records cache time. > > > >dig tells you that. > > > >> I'll check on BIND 8 package. >

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Chris Thompson
On Mar 9 2010, Sam Wilson wrote: In article , "ic.nssip" wrote: I find it useful to test records cache time. dig tells you that. I'll check on BIND 8 package. Thank you for pointing to a Solaris compatible source. Use dig from a recent BIND package, though you may find it's already t

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Sam Wilson
In article , "ic.nssip" wrote: > I find it useful to test records cache time. dig tells you that. > I'll check on BIND 8 package. > Thank you for pointing to a Solaris compatible source. Use dig from a recent BIND package, though you may find it's already there - ours is in /usr/local/bin/

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
I find it useful to test records cache time. I'll check on BIND 8 package. Thank you for pointing to a Solaris compatible source. Julian - Original Message - From: "Jeremy C. Reed" To: "ic.nssip" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:56 AM Subject: Re:

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, ic.nssip wrote: > Can somebody suggest a place where from I can download dnsquery source/pkg > to make it work on Solaris 10? It is available in old BIND 8 source. > I have it installed on a FreeBSD machine but imported to Solaris is > reporting some syntax error >   > # dnsq

dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
Hello everyone, Can somebody suggest a place where from I can download dnsquery source/pkg to make it work on Solaris 10? I have it installed on a FreeBSD machine but imported to Solaris is reporting some syntax error # dnsquery www.google.com dnsquery: syntax error at line 1: `(' unexpected T