Re: empty-zones not set warning, but have net 192.168.128/24

2013-02-16 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 02/16/2013 07:25 PM, Tony Finch wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have been getting this warning, and wonder why? I have read: https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00804/0/Why-does-named-log-an-error-disabling-RFC-1918-empty-zones-when-starting-up.html named logs the message if there are any RFC

Re: empty-zones not set warning, but have net 192.168.128/24

2013-02-16 Thread Tony Finch
Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have been getting this warning, and wonder why? > I have read: https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00804/0/Why-does-named-log-an-error-disabling-RFC-1918-empty-zones-when-starting-up.html named logs the message if there are any RFC 1918 zones that ought to be configured but

empty-zones not set warning, but have net 192.168.128/24

2013-02-15 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I have been getting this warning, and wonder why? I have read: https://kb.isc.org/.../Why-does-named-log-an-error-disabling-RFC-1918-empty-zones-when-starting-up.html I have a 128.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone zone in my internal view. So what might I be missing? Do I need to create my own deleg