Use of a hidden primary makes some sense for external (public) DNS, but IMO not
for situations where you would want to use GSS-TSIG. So while I would consider
this a bug, I don’t think it will be tripped often.
BIND does support multiple SPNs on a single server, but you have to change how
you c
When using GSS-TSIG, nsupdate (with the -g flag) always forms the SPN from the
master server specified in the SOA record, rather than the server specified
with the server command. Is that really correct behaviour, or should I report
this as a bug? I've been scouring the Internet, but couldn't fi
2 matches
Mail list logo
