On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 9:04:48 AM UTC-8, Bob Harold wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 6:32 PM, blrmaani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to put 4 DNS masters behind a vip and have several slaves
> doing the zone transfer from the VIP-IP. Is this normal?
>
>
>
> The usual approach is t
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 6:32 PM, blrmaani wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to put 4 DNS masters behind a vip and have several slaves
> doing the zone transfer from the VIP-IP. Is this normal?
>
> The usual approach is to have slaves getting zone transfers from multiple
> masters. What is the disadvan
On 09/12/15 23:32, blrmaani wrote:
Hi, I would like to put 4 DNS masters behind a vip and have several
slaves doing the zone transfer from the VIP-IP. Is this normal?
In my experience no, this is not normal.
You might consider putting a "virtual" or "service" IP on your master(s)
that you can
On 10/12/15 00:32, blrmaani wrote:
Hi Blr,
> I would like to put 4 DNS masters behind a vip and have several
> slaves doing the zone transfer from the VIP-IP. Is this normal?
>
> The usual approach is to have slaves getting zone transfers from
> multiple masters. What is the disadvantage of havi
On 12/09/15 16:32, blrmaani wrote:
I would like to put 4 DNS masters behind a vip and have several slaves doing
the zone transfer from the VIP-IP. Is this normal?
I don't know that I would consider this normal per say.
I'm assuming that you are talking some sort of network load balancer,
i.e
Hi,
I would like to put 4 DNS masters behind a vip and have several slaves doing
the zone transfer from the VIP-IP. Is this normal?
The usual approach is to have slaves getting zone transfers from multiple
masters. What is the disadvantage of having slaves using just the vip and have
all mast
6 matches
Mail list logo
