replicate a whole master

2016-09-19 Thread Pol Hallen
Hi all :-) dig yahoo.it @192.168.1.212 query is 38ms, second query is 1msec Can I replicate a whole internet primary dns to have on my bind in local network all domains name updated? Is 38ms an acceptable results? thanks for help Pol dig yahoo.it @192.168.1.212 ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-9+deb8u6-

Re: replicate a whole master

2016-09-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 19.09.16 15:51, Pol Hallen wrote: dig yahoo.it @192.168.1.212 query is 38ms, second query is 1msec Can I replicate a whole internet primary dns to have on my bind in local network all domains name updated? are you sure you want to replicate whole server? Are you sure you know what that me

Re: replicate a whole master

2016-09-19 Thread Pol Hallen
Huh? are you sure you want to replicate whole server? Are you sure you know what that means? mhmh... now I'm not sure :-' what does entail this? thanks Pol ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this

Re: replicate a whole master

2016-09-19 Thread /dev/rob0
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:51:17PM +0200, Pol Hallen wrote: > dig yahoo.it @192.168.1.212 > > query is 38ms, second query is 1msec > > Can I replicate a whole internet primary dns to have on my bind in > local network all domains name updated? "Internet primary dns", are you referring to the .i

Re: replicate a whole master

2016-09-19 Thread Tony Finch
/dev/rob0 wrote: > > If you're thinking that you can do this replication to improve DNS > performance, you're right, it will do that. But it certainly will > not scale (if it's even possible to get axfr/ixfr), and it won't > handle modern CDN systems properly. BIND 9.10 and later will keep popul

Re: replicate a whole master

2016-09-19 Thread Victoria Risk
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Tony Finch wrote: > > /dev/rob0 wrote: >> >> If you're thinking that you can do this replication to improve DNS >> performance, you're right, it will do that. But it certainly will >> not scale (if it's even possible to get axfr/ixfr), and it won't >> handle mode

Re: replicate a whole master

2016-09-19 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:40:17PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > /dev/rob0 wrote: > > > > If you're thinking that you can do this replication to improve DNS > > performance, you're right, it will do that. But it certainly will > > not scale (if it's even possible to get axfr/ixfr), and it won't > >

Re: replicate a whole master

2016-09-21 Thread Tony Finch
Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > > There's an attempt to make it go one step further by refreshing whole > zones in the cache: > > https://github.com/muks/dnsrefresh > > It needs another section to be completed before upload, possibly in time > for IETF-97. Oh dear, that is deeply problematic wrt DNSSEC