On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> but that non-auth kinda bugs me, because for my 'full' /24 subnets,
> that never happens. And it's delegated from the same Telco (Telus)
That's because "full" /24 subnets can be delegated easily using
subdomains, while a /28 needs classless de
Chris Buxton wrote, On 2011-11-03 10:57 PM:
Everything is working as it should. Your servers (I'm guessing they're your
servers) are responding authoritatively for the rewritten PTR record name.
You're seeing a non-authoritative response because you're asking for the
canonical PTR record name,
Everything is working as it should. Your servers (I'm guessing they're your
servers) are responding authoritatively for the rewritten PTR record name.
You're seeing a non-authoritative response because you're asking for the
canonical PTR record name, for which your server is not authoritative (T
I've got a fractional subnet 207.34.147.80/28 (.240)
To which my reverse always responds, but claims to be non-authoritative.
Then it points AT MY DNS to be authoritative.
I am unsure, but think it has something to do with way I have described
my in-addr.arpa file.
Would someone please offer sugge
4 matches
Mail list logo
