Hello,
I was wondering if someone on this list can assist me in figuring this out. I
am trying to run the rndc addzone / delzone for many domains at once on a set
of name servers. When this is done the the load on the box goes very high, and
the process just slows right down to a halt
Evan,
On Sun Jan 27 2013 at 00:10:28 CET, Evan Hunt wrote:
Delzone just means delete the zone from named, not delete the zone file
from the filesystem. (And I reckon we can do a good deal more harm by
deleting files you wanted to keep than by leaving files for you to delete
yourself...)
strongly? :)
3. If I direct `rndc addzone|delzone' to the same named instance from
multiple processes (from the same source IP address), is there any
danger of the .nzf file being corrupted?
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
-JP
___
Please
direct `rndc addzone|delzone' to the same named instance from
multiple processes (from the same source IP address), is there any
danger of the .nzf file being corrupted?
No. (Or, if so, it would be a serious flaw, and I haven't seen any bug
reports about that.)
--
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Hello,
Has anyone tried the new features of rndc addzone|delzone with
BIND-9.7?
Will the zone added|deleted get transfered between master and slaves?
Thanks.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from
Has anyone tried the new features of rndc addzone|delzone with
BIND-9.7?
Will the zone added|deleted get transfered between master and slaves?
No, the newly added (or deleted) zone will not be automatcially added to
(deleted from) slave servers. (Slaves require a different zone
definition
On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 13:05:41 +0100, Jan-Piet Mens jpmens@gmail.com
wrote:
Has anyone tried the new features of rndc addzone|delzone with
BIND-9.7?
Will the zone added|deleted get transfered between master and
slaves?
No, the newly added (or deleted) zone will not be automatcially added
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/1/12 1:18 PM, DNSbed.com wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 13:05:41 +0100, Jan-Piet Mens
jpmens@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone tried the new features of rndc addzone|delzone with
BIND-9.7? Will the zone added|deleted get transfered between
master
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 13:39:21 +0100, Carsten Strotmann (private)
c...@strotmann.de wrote:
This is an improvement over the situation without rndc addzone, where
one had to use some kind of remote access to change the named.conf on
the secondaries.
I have been doing this way with my dns
Hunt
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: rndc addzone/delzone in 9.7.2rc1 (was: rndc reconfig delays)
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Evan Hunt wrote:
Non-obvious isn't the point. We thought of having the file be named
directly after the view, but view names are allowed to include
characters
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Rob Foehl wrote:
My next step is going to be to experiment with the rndc addzone/delzone
feature in the 9.7.2 betas, which hopefully should avoid any need to attempt
a reconfig during normal use. That aside, is there anything else I could be
doing to speed things up?
I
I'm having a hard time following the motivation behind these changes. Why
is the filename non-configurable and non-obvious?
Non-configurable may change.
Non-obvious isn't the point. We thought of having the file be named
directly after the view, but view names are allowed to include
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Evan Hunt wrote:
Non-obvious isn't the point. We thought of having the file be named
directly after the view, but view names are allowed to include characters
that are forbidden in file names. Before opening the file we'd have to
check the name's legality, ensure it
13 matches
Mail list logo
