Re: rndc on local host: need named running?

2016-08-30 Thread Tom Browder
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016, Woodworth, John R < john.woodwo...@centurylink.com> wrote: > > I have a slightly unorthodox view on this which may even offer a bit more > > security. The answers are listed below inline. > > ... Thanks, John. Best regards, -Tom

Re: rndc on local host: need named running?

2016-08-30 Thread Tom Browder
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016, Cathy Almond wrote: > On 28/08/2016 02:48, Lyle wrote: > > Use any in the allow stanza. > > You'll be using a shared key for this to work anyway, but I'd suggest > being slightly more paranoid than 'any' in the allow stanza - perhaps > the address

RE: rndc on local host: need named running?

2016-08-30 Thread Woodworth, John R
> My plan is to have two remote, authoritative name servers > (master and slave) for my owned domains. I would like to use rndc > to control them from my local host. > > A couple of questions: Tom, I have a slightly unorthodox view on this which may even offer a bit more security. The answers

Re: rndc on local host: need named running?

2016-08-30 Thread Cathy Almond
On 28/08/2016 02:48, Lyle wrote: > Use any in the allow stanza. You'll be using a shared key for this to work anyway, but I'd suggest being slightly more paranoid than 'any' in the allow stanza - perhaps the address range in which your local machine is to be allocated its address?

Re: rndc on local host: need named running?

2016-08-27 Thread Lyle
Use any in the allow stanza. On 08/27/16 19:54, Tom Browder wrote: On Saturday, August 27, 2016, Lyle > wrote: On 08/27/16 10:54, Tom Browder wrote: https://calomel.org/dynamic_dns_ddns.htmlMy plan is to have two 2. Can I use

Re: rndc on local host: need named running?

2016-08-27 Thread Tom Browder
On Saturday, August 27, 2016, Lyle wrote: > On 08/27/16 10:54, Tom Browder wrote: > > https://calomel.org/dynamic_dns_ddns.htmlMy plan is to have two > > 2. Can I use rndc from my local host which doesn't have a fixed ip address? > > ... > Let me Google that for you and

Re: rndc on local host: need named running?

2016-08-27 Thread Lyle
On 08/27/16 10:54, Tom Browder wrote: My plan is to have two remote, authoritative name servers (master and slave) for my owned domains. I would like to use rndc to control them from my local host. A couple of questions: 1. Does named need to be running on the local host? No. 2. Can I

Re: rndc on local host: need named running?

2016-08-27 Thread Tom Browder
On Saturday, August 27, 2016, Warren Kumari wrote: > On Saturday, August 27, 2016, Tom Browder > wrote: > >> My plan is to have two remote, authoritative name servers (master and >> slave) for my

Re: rndc on local host: need named running?

2016-08-27 Thread Warren Kumari
On Saturday, August 27, 2016, Tom Browder wrote: > My plan is to have two remote, authoritative name servers (master and > slave) for my owned domains. I would like to use rndc to control them from > my local host. > > A couple of questions: > > 1. Does named need to be

rndc on local host: need named running?

2016-08-27 Thread Tom Browder
My plan is to have two remote, authoritative name servers (master and slave) for my owned domains. I would like to use rndc to control them from my local host. A couple of questions: 1. Does named need to be running on the local host? 2. Can I use rndc from my local host which doesn't have a