Re: [Bioc-devel] IRanges::endoapply looks for FUN in the wrong places?

2013-11-21 Thread Valerie Obenchain
Sorry. This was likely my error when I created the replacement methods. I see you've fixed it in svn, Martin, thanks. Val On 11/20/2013 07:00 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: Right, match.fun() needs to be within the initial endoapply, not later. Isn't the convention though to use `obeyQname<-` in

Re: [Bioc-devel] Subsetting an RleList object

2013-11-21 Thread Thomas Sandmann
Hi Herve, that's brilliant ! Thank you so much for optimizing the method. The new performance is very impressive. Cheers, Thomas [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listin

Re: [Bioc-devel] Subsetting an RleList object

2013-11-21 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Thomas, In some particular situations seqselect<- was using some tricks to be fast. In IRanges 1.20.6, I've ported these same tricks to [<- so the performance regression you report below should be gone. Let me know if you run into other issues with the subsetting code. Thanks, H. On 11/11/2