Re: [Bioc-devel] Distinction between release and devel package websites

2014-07-24 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
- Original Message - > From: "Leonardo Collado Torres" > To: bioc-devel@r-project.org > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 6:41:06 PM > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Distinction between release and devel package > websites > > > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:33:44 -0700 > > From: Martin Morg

Re: [Bioc-devel] Distinction between release and devel package websites

2014-07-24 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote: > Hi Henrik, > > > On 07/24/2014 06:03 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote: >>> >>> Hi Andrzej, >>> >>> >>> On 07/22/2014 02:28 PM, Andrzej Oleś wrote: Hi Hervé, thank you

Re: [Bioc-devel] A new way to manage side-by-side BioC release and Devel installs

2014-07-24 Thread Gabe Becker
Herve, It doesn't handle that, so it is a time-saving approximation akin to devtools, rather than an exact solution. I recognize and agree with the reasons that Bioc devel targets R devel (sometimes); the question becomes how often BioC devel will actually fail if you use an R with a slightly "ol

[Bioc-devel] changing genome of TxDb

2014-07-24 Thread Michael Lawrence
Seems like this should work genome(gene.models) <- "GRCh37" but Error in .seqinfo.TranscriptDbReplace(x, new2old = new2old, force = force, : 'new2old' must be specified when replacing the 'seqinfo' of a TranscriptDb object Michael [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___

Re: [Bioc-devel] A new way to manage side-by-side BioC release and Devel installs

2014-07-24 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Gabe, Thanks for the heads up, sounds promising. Note that one major difficulty of switching between BioC release and devel is that between October and April it also requires to switch between R release and devel. How is that handled in switchr? Thanks, H. On 07/24/2014 08:42 AM, Gabe Beck

[Bioc-devel] A new way to manage side-by-side BioC release and Devel installs

2014-07-24 Thread Gabe Becker
Hey all, One of the things that has come up from the recent Release/Devel distinction thread on this list is that people don't consider there to be an easy way of handling both at the same time. I'd like to offer an alternative based on the switchr https://github.com/gmbecker/switchr package I'm

Re: [Bioc-devel] Distinction between release and devel package websites

2014-07-24 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Henrik, On 07/24/2014 06:03 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote: Hi Andrzej, On 07/22/2014 02:28 PM, Andrzej Oleś wrote: Hi Hervé, thank you for the demo! Yes, this is definitely much more clear than just a different color. Maybe we could firs

Re: [Bioc-devel] Distinction between release and devel package websites

2014-07-24 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote: > Hi Andrzej, > > > On 07/22/2014 02:28 PM, Andrzej Oleś wrote: >> >> Hi Hervé, >> >> thank you for the demo! Yes, this is definitely much more clear than >> just a different color. Maybe we could first implement this idea on >> the build/check r

Re: [Bioc-devel] [bug] goseq fails when dplyr has been loaded

2014-07-24 Thread Keith Hughitt
Thanks, Martin! That is just what I was looking for. Cheers, Keith On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Martin Morgan wrote: > On 07/13/2014 05:24 AM, Keith Hughitt wrote: > >> (patch with above change...) >> >> > it's better to amend the NAMESPACE to include > > importFrom(AnnotationDbi, select