Re: [Bioc-devel] BrowserViz

2015-04-03 Thread Hector Corrada Bravo
The JS side of Epiviz defines classes for GRanges and SummarizedExperiment type objects, with epivizr defining how json is created to transfer it. In principle it should be straightforward to incorporate to projects like these (the JS src is part of the epivizr package for example). In Epiviz/Epiv

Re: [Bioc-devel] BrowserViz

2015-04-03 Thread Michael Lawrence
The high-level type issue is sort of discussed here: http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/123000545/ch17.html#_subprotocol_negotiation What about extending your protocol so that the payload consists of two fields: content-type and content, where the content-type adheres to the media type spec

Re: [Bioc-devel] BrowserViz

2015-04-03 Thread Michael Lawrence
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Paul Shannon < paul.thurmond.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Great to get your response, comments and questions. Answers attempted > below. > > I think our overriding difference lies in our contrasting experience of > complexity. I have come to see web

Re: [Bioc-devel] BrowserViz: curious but needs a small tweak to run example

2015-04-03 Thread Leonardo Collado Torres
Forgot to add bioc-devel On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Leonardo Collado Torres wrote: > Hi, > > From the April newsletter I got curious about BrowserViz but I > couldn't run the simple example as-is. From > http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/BrowserViz/ I > can see that vers

[Bioc-devel] BrowserViz

2015-04-03 Thread Michael Lawrence
Thanks to Val's excellent newsletter, I've had my first glance at BrowserViz. I'm glad to see something that is more flexible and low-level than e.g. shiny. I'm curious about the motivation behind web sockets. I guess any application with an R-driven web UI actually has two UIs: the R console and

[Bioc-devel] Bioconductor Newsletter - April 2015

2015-04-03 Thread Valerie Obenchain
Now available at http://bioconductor.org/help/newsletters/2015_April/ ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Re: [Bioc-devel] Build error for DESeq2 dev causing error in other package builds

2015-04-03 Thread Martin Morgan
On 04/03/2015 04:37 AM, Andrea Rau wrote: Hello, I am the maintainer of a Bioconductor package called 'HTSFilter' that imports DESeq2. On today's build report, I see that my package (as well as DESeq2 and all of the other packages that import it) is showing an error message which seems to arise

Re: [Bioc-devel] Build error for DESeq2 dev causing error in other package builds

2015-04-03 Thread Michael Love
hi Andrea, I sent out an email to bioc-devel at the same time as you :) https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2015-April/007269.html I think this might be fixed already, but I didn't have time to try out GenomicRanges 1.19.51 yet. I will try soon, and if this doesn't fix it, I have a hack t

[Bioc-devel] Build error for DESeq2 dev causing error in other package builds

2015-04-03 Thread Andrea Rau
Hello, I am the maintainer of a Bioconductor package called 'HTSFilter' that imports DESeq2. On today's build report, I see that my package (as well as DESeq2 and all of the other packages that import it) is showing an error message which seems to arise from a recent change in the DESeq2 code

Re: [Bioc-devel] SummarizedExperiment, differing assay dimnames

2015-04-03 Thread Michael Love
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Michael Love wrote: > hi Martin, > > I noticed with GenomicRanges 1.19.51, a new, or newly functional, > check on dimnames differing between assays. ah, I'm still using 1.19.50, maybe that's the issue. But I'd still like to hear what the new behavior will be so I c

[Bioc-devel] SummarizedExperiment, differing assay dimnames

2015-04-03 Thread Michael Love
hi Martin, I noticed with GenomicRanges 1.19.51, a new, or newly functional, check on dimnames differing between assays. It might be convenient to add an option that assays() will take an incoming matrix without error no matter what, even if the dimnames on the incoming matrix are not the same as