Re: [Bioc-devel] Windows-only issue with downloading a Rdata file and loading it with R

2016-06-17 Thread Leonardo Collado Torres
Hi, I get the same error while hosting the data somewhere else or when using RawGit's url. That is: > library('downloader') > download(' http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~lcollado/recount/metadata_clean_sra.Rdata', destfile = 'test2.Rdata') > load('tes2t.Rdata') Error: ReadItem: unknown type 50, perh

Re: [Bioc-devel] Windows-only issue with downloading a Rdata file and loading it with R

2016-06-17 Thread Gabe Becker
I wonder if raw only means "raw after line return munging"? can you attach the file that gets downloaded via email? (off list is fine) On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Leonardo Collado Torres wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to figure out what is going wrong with an error that pops > up on Windows o

[Bioc-devel] Windows-only issue with downloading a Rdata file and loading it with R

2016-06-17 Thread Leonardo Collado Torres
Hi, I'm trying to figure out what is going wrong with an error that pops up on Windows only. It's currently the only error for a package that I recently submitted to Bioc. The function is fairly simple: it downloads a Rdata file from the web and loads it. If I try to download and load the file wi

Re: [Bioc-devel] poor performance of snpsByOverlaps()

2016-06-17 Thread Vincent Carey
I think you can get relevant information rapidly from the dbsnp vcf. You would acquire ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/organisms/human_9606/VCF/00-common_all.vcf.gz ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/organisms/human_9606/VCF/00-common_all.vcf.gz.tbi and wrap in a TabixFile > tf class: TabixFile

Re: [Bioc-devel] outdated data package in development branch

2016-06-17 Thread Mike
Valerie At the time when I posted the question, it was still 2.9.1 and definitely wasn't built for more than two weeks. Anyway, it is now updated. Thanks, Mike On 06/17/2016 09:32 AM, Obenchain, Valerie wrote: Hi Mike, We went down to just a single build per week (Saturday I think) for exper

[Bioc-devel] poor performance of snpsByOverlaps()

2016-06-17 Thread Robert Castelo
hi, the performance of snpsByOverlaps() in terms of time and memory consumption is quite poor and i wonder whether there is some bug in the code. here's one example: library(GenomicRanges) library(SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP144.GRCh37) snps <- SNPlocs.Hsapiens.dbSNP144.GRCh37 gr <- GRanges(seqna

Re: [Bioc-devel] outdated data package in development branch

2016-06-17 Thread Obenchain, Valerie
Hi Mike, We went down to just a single build per week (Saturday I think) for experiment data packages. Here are the last commits I see in the devel branch: r3785 | m.jiang | 2016-06-03 12:29:00 -0700 (Fri, 03 Jun 2016) | 1

Re: [Bioc-devel] New argument 'use.names' in granges() function

2016-06-17 Thread Leonard Goldstein
Thanks Hervé. Leonard On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote: > Done in SGSeq 1.6.3 (release) and 1.7.4 (devel). > > Also done in SomaticSignatures 2.8.4 (release) and 2.9.4 (devel). > > I scanned the entire Rpacks folder and those are the only 2 packages > I found that contain call

Re: [Bioc-devel] Update git-mirrors

2016-06-17 Thread Kasper Daniel Hansen
If you have committed and pushed everything to GitHub, there will be nothing lost by my solution. Just a few minutes of re-cloning. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Elena Grassi wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Thomas Lin Pedersen > wrote: > > Thanks for that - for some reason it doe

Re: [Bioc-devel] Update git-mirrors

2016-06-17 Thread Elena Grassi
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Thomas Lin Pedersen wrote: > Thanks for that - for some reason it doesn’t create a local release-3.3 > branch that can be synced to svn? Anyway, I think it’s fair to say that there > need to be some convenient way to update ones git environment after each > Bioc

Re: [Bioc-devel] Update git-mirrors

2016-06-17 Thread Kasper Daniel Hansen
What I do, which is not ideal, is to delete my git checkout; re-clone it from GitHub and run update_remotes. It is likely these things will change substantially before next release, so I don't think anyone should spend time fixing this right now. Best, Kasper On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tho

Re: [Bioc-devel] Update git-mirrors

2016-06-17 Thread Thomas Lin Pedersen
Thanks for that - for some reason it doesn’t create a local release-3.3 branch that can be synced to svn? Anyway, I think it’s fair to say that there need to be some convenient way to update ones git environment after each Bioconductor release… > On 17 Jun 2016, at 10:58, Elena Grassi wrote:

Re: [Bioc-devel] New argument 'use.names' in granges() function

2016-06-17 Thread Hervé Pagès
Done in SGSeq 1.6.3 (release) and 1.7.4 (devel). Also done in SomaticSignatures 2.8.4 (release) and 2.9.4 (devel). I scanned the entire Rpacks folder and those are the only 2 packages I found that contain calls to granges() with 2 unnamed arguments. Sorry for the trouble. H. On 06/16/2016 11:

Re: [Bioc-devel] Update git-mirrors

2016-06-17 Thread Elena Grassi
I manually added the tracking of the release branch picking some piece of code from update_remotes.sh: $ git config --add svn-remote.release-3.3.url https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioconductor/branches/RELEASE_3_3/madman/Rpacks/PACKAGENAME $ git config --add svn-remote.release-3.3.fetch :refs/remotes/

[Bioc-devel] Update git-mirrors

2016-06-17 Thread Thomas Lin Pedersen
I set-up the git mirror for my PanVizGenerator package while it was still only in devel. After the latest release there is no tracking of the release branch, and thus no way to push bug fixes for release. Is there any vetted way of updating/reinstalling the git-mirrors? running bash update_rem

Re: [Bioc-devel] SVN and GitHub mirror out-of-sync

2016-06-17 Thread Philipp Angerer
On Montag, 18. April 2016 08:10:12 CEST Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > Should be caught up now. > Dan hi, i have the same problem with destiny: the newest commits appear in the SVN but not github (DESCRIPTION has 1.3.3 vs. 1.3.0) SVN: https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioconductor/trunk/madman/Rpacks/destiny/