On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Martin Morgan
wrote:
> You can create a plain text file in the root directory of your package
> .BBSoptions with the line
>
> UnsupportedPlatform: win
>
> Your package will not be available on Windows, losing about 1/2 your
> potential audience.
I'm not sure how
You can create a plain text file in the root directory of your package
.BBSoptions with the line
UnsupportedPlatform: win
Your package will not be available on Windows, losing about 1/2 your
potential audience. A better strategy is to figure out why you are
Suggests:'ing Rsubread, and find
I guess I was unclear. what I was asking is if it is, e.g., *required* for
your vignette, e.g. to create a data structure that is then used by your
functions.
That is a pretty standard use of Suggests, though obviously not the only
one. My point was really that the package only being suggests is n
Only if Rsubread is used unconditionally.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Gabe Becker wrote:
> Vivek,
>
> Why (ie in what sense) is the package suggested? Is it used in your tests,
> examples, or vignette?
>
> If so, those would also fail during R CMD check if the package is not
> available even
Vivek,
Why (ie in what sense) is the package suggested? Is it used in your tests,
examples, or vignette?
If so, those would also fail during R CMD check if the package is not
available even if that environment variable is were false, wouldn't they?
~G
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Bhardwaj,
Hi All
My package is in review and the build is failing since a suggested package
(Rsubread) is not available on windows. Is there a way for me to instruct the
build machine on bioc to use: _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_ = FALSE ??
Best,
Vivek
Vivek Bhardwaj
PhD Candidate | Internation
Thank you. This is corrected and should be reflected shortly.
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core Team
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Bioc-devel on behalf of Tim T
On 05/18/2018 03:28 AM, Neumann, Steffen wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 18:11 -0400, Martin Morgan wrote:
...
- version() version of Bioconductor in use
- valid() are all Bioconductor packages from the same
Bioconductor
version?
I'd like to challenge the concept of the release
and
On the Install page, https://www.bioconductor.org/install/, I just noticed
that in the box on the right hand side, the "Worflow packages" link is
misspelled (missing 'k').
--t
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org ma
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:28 AM, Neumann, Steffen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 18:11 -0400, Martin Morgan wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >- version() version of Bioconductor in use
> >- valid() are all Bioconductor packages from the same
> > Bioconductor
> > version?
>
> I'd like to chall
Dear Bioconductor team,
I'm the maintainer of the FELLA package.
Lately the check in tokay2 has failed, see
http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/release/bioc-LATEST/FELLA/tokay2-checksrc.html
Specifically: Message: At vector.pmt:442 : cannot reserve space for vector, Out
of memory
Class: si
Hi,
On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 18:11 -0400, Martin Morgan wrote:
>
> ...
>- version() version of Bioconductor in use
>- valid() are all Bioconductor packages from the same
> Bioconductor
> version?
I'd like to challenge the concept of the release
and the pretty strong term valid(). I think
12 matches
Mail list logo