> Having said that, I'll note that specifying R as a dependency, and a version
> of R as a criterion for your package, is really a mis-nomer for a
> Bioconductor package -- of course it uses R, and the version of R in use
> determines the Bioconductor version(s) that can be used! So a rational
> From the above example, if I had the BPPARAM argument, it’d also clearly add
> a lot of code noise:
>
> data %>%
> apply_methods(method_list1, BPPARAM = MulticoreParam(stop.on.error=FALSE)) %>%
> apply_methods(method_list2, BPPARAM = MulticoreParam(stop.on.error=FALSE)) %>%
>
Probably my rant yesterday was a bit confused.
BiocCheck tries to encourage better practice. If you've chosen to specify
version (maybe there are reasons for this, e.g., because in the past you have
distributed your package through non-Bioconductor channels), then specify it
correctly.
On the
