Re: [Bioc-devel] name for new BioC package

2023-02-03 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Matteo. We had DESeq2 after DESeq, Rbowtie2 after Rbowtie, MOFA2 after MOFA, etc.. so I don't see any problem, but thanks for asking! Best, H. On 03/02/2023 00:08, Matteo Tiberti wrote: dear maintainers, I am currently listed as maintainer of Bioconductor package MoonlightR, designed f

Re: [Bioc-devel] name for new BioC package

2023-02-03 Thread Laurent Gatto
Dear Matteo, Not a direct answer to your question, but here's another angle to it, from a software development perspective. Once Moonlight2R will be available, would you consider MoonlightR to still be a viable alternative? If not, then you should also plan the deprecation of MoonlightR. In th

[Bioc-devel] name for new BioC package

2023-02-03 Thread Matteo Tiberti
dear maintainers, I am currently listed as maintainer of Bioconductor package MoonlightR, designed for the prediction of cancer driver genes, which implements the Moonlight workflow. We are currently working on a second version of our workflow, called Moonlight2, and would like to have it rele