Yes, deprecating the current package and submitting a revised proposal with a new name is the way to go.
Thanks, H. On 11/24/23 14:17, mauro castro wrote: > Hello Bioconductor Team, > > We have a package that has been part of Bioconductor for a while, and we > are considering the possibility of renaming it. > > We understand that this is not a straightforward process, and we are aware > of Bioconductor's encouragement not to rename packages. > > However, we are currently working on publishing a paper about this package. > Following editorial recommendations, we have been asked to address several > reviewer demands, one of which involves renaming the package to better > align its primary objectives with the paper's narrative, title, and > abstract. > > If necessary, we are open to deprecating the current package and submitting > a revised proposal with a new name. > > I would greatly appreciate your assistance in navigating this process. > > Best, > > Mauro > > --- > > Prof. Mauro Castro, MD, PhD > Bioinformatics & Systems Biology Lab > Polytechnic Center > Federal University of Paraná - UFPR > Rua Alcides Vieira Arcoverde, 1225 > Curitiba - PR 81520-260 - Brazil > > E-mail:mauro.cas...@ufpr.br > Phone: +55-41-33614906 > https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-8131 > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel -- Hervé Pagès Bioconductor Core Team hpages.on.git...@gmail.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel