[Bioc-devel] problems understanding build error

2024-07-29 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel via Bioc-devel
Hi Michael, Thanks for reporting. This has been fixed in the latest version of BiocCheck (1.41.9). Best regards, Marcel On 7/26/24 5:29 AM, Michael Shapiro wrote: > We are currently working through the submission of a new package, CatsCradle > (issue #3452). We get a build error from the

Re: [Bioc-devel] EXTERNAL: "invalid connection" when building vignette - Windows only

2024-03-18 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel via Bioc-devel
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1sueUdsK2Nz46WceAI1X6J67uFFM4_-u2jsnjTzB4mkwMvdEsSqAd2dQ2-C_PTyi1dXgO7I1PdRSWM1TSOkP8ieQ2xCOa036oa-ucQTY65o6nSR__aVhVG5mI0HkLQOX7ihiKsmVFswSw_ghYaSi8hBnVRfafVS6G7TxPRtg4knMhWV7DDnO7bNGhPjPXxAqMVoJJkH0URd9lH2NIGtfNC8LmoeJ1htzSq3Tn_z2gmPSV1UtK_2fAe3Z_ixAeq1eYzWU7nfZ-5_l23cQyeOpSY0B9R6DH_eKA2v8ziUsBhVIrBLPYvODWunlR3ZXqIcvN/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cancer.dk%2Fom-os%2Fprivatlivspolitik%2F> > > *From: *Ramos Perez, Marcel &

Re: [Bioc-devel] EXTERNAL: "invalid connection" when building vignette - Windows only

2024-03-15 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel via Bioc-devel
Hi Matteo, I was also able to reproduce on Bioc 3.18 on Windows with a traceback (see below). It may be that there are symbol clashes between parallel runs in the `foreach:::.foreachGlobals` environment as described in https://stackoverflow.com/a/67497500 Clearing the symbols in that

Re: [Bioc-devel] DataFrame conversion

2024-03-13 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel via Bioc-devel
Hi Daniel, Thanks for posting. Hervé has asked on the R-devel mailing list: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2024-March/083265.html I don't think you will have to do anything in your package. Once fixed, the messages will go away. Best regards, Marcel On 3/13/24 5:09 PM, Daniel

Re: [Bioc-devel] Error installing rtracklayer in BioC devel docker

2024-02-15 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel via Bioc-devel
Hi Shraddha, It looks like Michael has fixed this on GitHub: https://github.com/lawremi/rtracklayer/commit/86407bbef2d02455053b7b7c96afe9c5ce6949e7 but the fix hasn't been pushed to Bioconductor devel. In the meantime, you can install the GH version with

Re: [Bioc-devel] BiocCheck error

2024-01-25 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel via Bioc-devel
Hi Marek, Thanks for pointing this out in release. I have applied the patch to BiocCheck version 1.38.1. FWIW, this issue was first opened here https://github.com/Bioconductor/BiocCheck/issues/135 Best regards, Marcel On 1/25/24 9:24 AM, Marek Gierlinski (Staff) wrote: > Yes, it must be this.

Re: [Bioc-devel] IFAA Bioconductor

2024-01-16 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel via Bioc-devel
Hi Zhigang, AFAICT, I don't see `crossprod` as an exported symbol in `MatrixExtra`. > library(MatrixExtra) > ls("package:MatrixExtra") Did you mean Matrix:: or base:: crossprod? Best regards, Marcel On 1/16/24 10:14 AM, Zhigang Li wrote: Hi There, It seems that the error says : " **

Re: [Bioc-devel] Single Package Builder failing to detect subscription to the Bioc-devel mailing list

2024-01-10 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel via Bioc-devel
Hi Boyi, This has been resolved in BiocCheck version 1.39.12. https://github.com/Bioconductor/BiocCheck/issues/205 Best regards, Marcel On 1/10/24 2:53 PM, Boyi Guo wrote: Hi, I had the same problem ( https://bioconductor.org/spb_reports/tpSVG_buildreport_20240109095309.html). * Checking

Re: [Bioc-devel] S4 accessor conflict (MoleculeExperiement)

2023-10-31 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel via Bioc-devel
Hi Nick, Git blame says the 'molecules' method and generic have been in SpatialExperiment for at least 2 years. It looks like the maintainers of MoleculeExperiment should import the molecules generic and export only their method. The other option is to have a separate package with only

Re: [Bioc-devel] KEGGREST is broken and has a long reverse-dependency chain.

2023-09-25 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel via Bioc-devel
Thank you for the fix. I have updated the package. Best, Marcel On 9/21/23 7:12 PM, Ali Sajid Imami wrote: I'll take a look. I rely on KEGGREST a lot. Regards, Dr. Ali Sajid Imami LinkedIn

Re: [Bioc-devel] EXTERNAL: Re: Bad description file

2023-04-04 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel
Thank you Martin for providing the link. I misread the changes on the release branch. It looks like the DESCRIPTION file should be modified by removing the merge commit tag and following the bug fix instructions here:

Re: [Bioc-devel] EXTERNAL: Bad description file

2023-04-04 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel
Hi Matineh, It looks like there was some extra text in the DESCRIPTION at commit 83ab252 : >>> 509b8e4 (version bump) The next build of the release branch will happen tomorrow. It should be cleared up by then based on the changes you've made. Best regards, Marcel On 4/4/23 2:59 PM,

Re: [Bioc-devel] EXTERNAL: Re: SPB inconsistencies

2019-03-04 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel
-write an existing resource? I think the best practice would be to create > a new resource, with updated curateTCGAData package & version bump. Martin > > On 3/4/19, 2:31 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Ramos Perez, Marcel" > marcel.ramospe...@roswellpark.org> wrote

Re: [Bioc-devel] mzR update in the making: any Travis experts ?

2019-03-04 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel
Hi Steffen, I haven't played with it yet but Travis CI has an Artifacts addon that will trigger in the `after_script` or `after_failure` stages of the build and upload log files to an AWS bucket. You can see the details here: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/uploading-artifacts/ Best regards,

Re: [Bioc-devel] SPB inconsistencies

2019-03-04 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel
Hi Martin, I suspect that this is due to caching because I'm unable to reproduce including after deleting my hub cache. hb <- ExperimentHub::ExperimentHub() #> snapshotDate(): 2019-01-25 unlink( AnnotationHub::hubCache(hb), recursive = TRUE, force = TRUE ) suppressMessages({

Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue with an illegal version bump message when updating an old experiment data package

2018-09-25 Thread Ramos Perez, Marcel
Hi Leonardo, Keep in mind that GitHub and the Bioconductor git server are two different animals. You should be pushing your changes to the git server as you would with software packages ( `g...@git.bioconductor.org:packages/derfinderData` ). My guess is that the hook is looking at the version