rk 14263
From: Ralf Weber
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 9:03 AM
To: Shepherd, Lori
Cc: Neumann, Steffen ; Turaga, Nitesh
; ashku...@gatech.edu ;
bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] New package submission : No reviewer communication.
Dear Steffen and Lori,
effen
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 2:59 AM
> To: Turaga, Nitesh ; ashku...@gatech.edu <
> ashku...@gatech.edu>; bioc-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] New package submission : No reviewer
> communication.
>
> Hi,
>
> I think there is quite some b
; ashku...@gatech.edu
; bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] New package submission : No reviewer communication.
Hi,
I think there is quite some backlog from September
https://github.com/Bioconductor/Contributions/labels/1.%20awaiting%20moderation
Maybe the BioC team can use the
t; From: Turaga, Nitesh
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:56 PM
> To: Kumar, Ashwath ;
> bioc-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] New package submission : No reviewer
> communication.
>
> Hi,
>
> Please be patient in this
r, Ashwath ; bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] New package submission : No reviewer
communication.
Hi,
Please be patient in this regard. The reviewer will get to your package as
soon as they can. Each package takes time to review, and each reviewer is
reviewin
Message-
From: Turaga, Nitesh
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:56 PM
To: Kumar, Ashwath ; bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] New package submission : No reviewer communication.
Hi,
Please be patient in this regard. The reviewer will get to your package as soon
as they can
Hi,
Please be patient in this regard. The reviewer will get to your package as soon
as they can. Each package takes time to review, and each reviewer is reviewing
multiple packages.
As far as asking for support regarding your package, it is best to ask your
questions on the "Issue" which was
Hello all,
I recently submitted a package to Bioconductor and I have not heard back from
the reviewer about any feedback or acceptance or otherwise. The package has
indeed passed all the automated tests and is awaiting the revision on the next
stage of review process. Is there a recommended
