- Original Message -
> > From: "Andrzej Oleś" <andrzej.o...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtene...@fredhutch.org>, "bioc-devel" <
> bioc-devel@r-project.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 12:35:19 AM
> > Sub
Hi Dan,
I find that the coverage shields are an extremely useful metrics for both
end-users and package developers, as they reflect code quality and motivate
to improve package test coverage.
I've noticed that the badges are not updated as frequently as I would
expect. Most of the packages on
Hi Andrzej,
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrzej Oleś" <andrzej.o...@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtene...@fredhutch.org>, "bioc-devel"
> <bioc-devel@r-project.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 12:35:19 AM
>
Hello Bioconductors,
We're pleased to announce a new shield to join the ones we rolled out in May.
The new shield measures test coverage of a package, as determined by Jim
Hester's covr package.
Coverage is a measure of the degree to which package code is tested by your
unit tests
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Dan Tenenbaum dtene...@fredhutch.org wrote:
Hello Bioconductors,
We're pleased to announce a new shield to join the ones we rolled out in May.
The new shield measures test coverage of a package, as determined by Jim
Hester's covr package.
Coverage is a
