Dear Dan,
On Mo, 2016-04-04 at 23:22 -0700, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
[...]
>
> >
> > I have to say that I always have been perplexed by late changes
> > in the BioC toolchain.
[...]
>
> To clarify, this toolchain is being adopted by R and CRAN.
That's what I meant, I didn't intend to blame it on
Hi,
On Mo, 2016-04-04 at 12:00 -0700, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>
> Accordingly, Bioconductor has updated its release schedule:
> https://bioconductor.org/developers/release-schedule/
Thanks for the notification.
>
> [...]
> The reason for the delay in R's release schedule is the new Windows
>
Bioconductors--
In case you missed it, R announced a delay in its release schedule:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-announce/2016/000599.html
Their full (updated) release schedule is at
http://developer.r-project.org/
Accordingly, Bioconductor has updated its release schedule:
Martin's email prompts me to correct my earlier email where I gave out
misleading information.
New packages have to be submitted to us by March 25.
April 6 is our internal deadline for not adding any new packages to the
release, but it has no significance for package developers. So ignore
The Bioconductor 3.3 release schedule is now available:
http://bioconductor.org/developers/release-schedule/
One important deadline is April 6, after which we will not accept any new
packages into the release.
Also, all packages must pass R CMD build and R CMD check without error by April
1,
