Re: [Bioc-devel] DT CRAN vs github versions

2016-03-10 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
- Original Message - > From: "Laurent Gatto" > To: "Gabe Becker" > Cc: "Lisa Breckels" , "bioc-devel" > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 4:59:55 PM > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] DT CRAN vs github versions > On 11 March 2016 00:4

Re: [Bioc-devel] DT CRAN vs github versions

2016-03-10 Thread Laurent Gatto
On 11 March 2016 00:41, Gabe Becker wrote: > Laurent, > > I'd argue quite strongly against this from a systems perspective. Your > package wouldn't be installable via biocLite. That function can see github > repos, but only when told to and not as dependencies AFAIK. A package > passing but being

Re: [Bioc-devel] DT CRAN vs github versions

2016-03-10 Thread Gabe Becker
Laurent, I'd argue quite strongly against this from a systems perspective. Your package wouldn't be installable via biocLite. That function can see github repos, but only when told to and not as dependencies AFAIK. A package passing but being uninstsllable would be a Very Bad Thing (tm) IMHO. You

[Bioc-devel] DT CRAN vs github versions

2016-03-10 Thread Laurent Gatto
Dear all, There have been some substantial changes in Rstudio's DT package recently [1], in particular with respect to selecting rows in a table. One problem is that these updates currently only live on github (version 0.1.45) while CRAN is stuck at version 0.1 since September 2015. This has been