Re: [Bioc-devel] Is version 1.1.0 correct for a new released package?

2017-11-02 Thread Shepherd, Lori
05 PM To: Shepherd, Lori; bioc-devel Subject: RE: [Bioc-devel] Is version 1.1.0 correct for a new released package? Thanks for your thorough answer. So, when I’m going to push the first devel change, the version must be 1.1.1 while bug fixes for the released package will start from 1.0.1. Am I right?

Re: [Bioc-devel] Is version 1.1.0 correct for a new released package?

2017-11-01 Thread Arman Shahrisa
9:49:40 PM To: Arman Shahrisa; bioc-devel Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Is version 1.1.0 correct for a new released package? Yes this is correct - Pkg_version x.y.z We do a version bump on the devel version of the package to make the versioning consistent with release( y even in release) - hence

Re: [Bioc-devel] Is version 1.1.0 correct for a new released package?

2017-11-01 Thread Hervé Pagès
On 11/01/2017 11:14 AM, Arman Shahrisa wrote: Hi, There are two GitHub commits for my package �cbaf� by Bioconductor on 30 October. The interesting thing is the first commit changes version in description file from 0.99.8 to 1.0.0 while the second one changes 1.0.0 to 1.1.0. Is it correct?

Re: [Bioc-devel] Is version 1.1.0 correct for a new released package?

2017-11-01 Thread Shepherd, Lori
Biostatistics & Bioinformatics Elm & Carlton Streets Buffalo, New York 14263 From: Bioc-devel on behalf of Arman Shahrisa Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14:54 PM To: bioc-devel Subject: [Bioc-devel] Is version 1.1.0 correct for a new released packa