Re: [Bioc-devel] License question for experimental data package

2016-03-04 Thread davide risso
Thank you all for the useful suggestions and links. I like the idea of using a CC0 license. That's likely what I will go for. Best, davide On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:42 AM Tim Triche, Jr. wrote: > I was going to mention droit d'auteur under EU common law, but somehow > that seemed more in Hervé

Re: [Bioc-devel] License question for experimental data package

2016-03-04 Thread Tim Triche, Jr.
I was going to mention droit d'auteur under EU common law, but somehow that seemed more in Hervé's wheelhouse ;-). --t > On Mar 4, 2016, at 7:17 AM, Lyle Burgoon wrote: > > Also keep in mind US copyright rules for data are different from European. We > ran into this recently when wanting to

Re: [Bioc-devel] License question for experimental data package

2016-03-04 Thread Lyle Burgoon
Also keep in mind US copyright rules for data are different from European. We ran into this recently when wanting to publish european data from a web database. On Mar 4, 2016 10:05 AM, "Tim Triche, Jr." wrote: > Data (facts) are not copyright worthy, but databases (collections of > facts) can be.

Re: [Bioc-devel] License question for experimental data package

2016-03-04 Thread Tim Triche, Jr.
Data (facts) are not copyright worthy, but databases (collections of facts) can be. See Feist v Rural for precedent; in short, there must be an inobvious and creative aspect to the database for it to be elevated to copyrightable status. I doubt that a collection of datasets would clear this ba

Re: [Bioc-devel] License question for experimental data package

2016-03-04 Thread Robert M. Flight
I am pretty sure in general "data" is not copyrightable per se ( http://www.lib.umich.edu/copyright/facts-and-data), so while I might contact the original authors as a courtesy, if the data has been released into any public database, then you should be free to do with it as you please. Providing th

Re: [Bioc-devel] License question for experimental data package

2016-03-04 Thread Kasper Daniel Hansen
For data packages, which does not contain any code, it seems weird to use a software license such as GPL or GPL-2. It seems better to use something like Artistic-2.0 or one of the CC licenses. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:15 PM, davide risso wrote: > Hi Hervé and Sean, > > thanks for your help. It

Re: [Bioc-devel] License question for experimental data package

2016-03-03 Thread davide risso
Hi Hervé and Sean, thanks for your help. It will indeed be interesting to hear how other people chose the license, especially for those package that redistribute a dataset not from their lab. I do have an experimental data package in Bioc, zebrafishRNASeq, but it's an experiment from a collaborat

Re: [Bioc-devel] License question for experimental data package

2016-03-03 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Davide, On 03/01/2016 02:25 PM, davide risso wrote: Dear Bioc developers, I recently downloaded three publicly available single-cell RNA-seq datasets from the NCBI GEO/SRA repository and created an R package with some gene-level summaries (read counts and FPKMs). I'm currently using the pac

[Bioc-devel] License question for experimental data package

2016-03-01 Thread davide risso
Dear Bioc developers, I recently downloaded three publicly available single-cell RNA-seq datasets from the NCBI GEO/SRA repository and created an R package with some gene-level summaries (read counts and FPKMs). I'm currently using the package locally for my own tests, but I'm thinking that this