On 05/18/2015 06:06 AM, Christian Arnold wrote:
Thanks for your input, highly appreciated!
I can see that the semantics of "[" are violated, so I agree that
overwriting the "subset" method is probably a better way to go.
Essentially, the object stores several, individual-specific count
matrice
Thanks for your input, highly appreciated!
I can see that the semantics of "[" are violated, so I agree that
overwriting the "subset" method is probably a better way to go.
Essentially, the object stores several, individual-specific count
matrices from RNA-Seq experiments in an potentially al
I agree with Wolfgang that the semantics of [ are being violated here. It
would though help if you could be a little less vague about your intent.
What is this data structure going to store, how should it behave?
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Christian Arnold
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am about
Dear Christian
not sure this is a wise idea, it breaks the semantics of “[“.
The number of elements stored in an array is the product of the extent of its
dimensions.
In your example, it is the sum.
To put it less abstract, a[1:2, 2, 3:4, 1] for a regular array is a 2 x 2
matrix, whereas in your
Hi there,
I am about to develop a Bioconductor package that implements a custom S4
object, and I am currently thinking about a few issues, including the
following:
Say we have an S4 object that stores a lot of information in different
slots. Assume that it does make sense to extract informat
