Hello all,
I've encountered some unexpected behaviour with some of the base classes
while developing stuff for genomic interactions. The first issue lies
with the subset replacement in the Vector class. Let's say I make a
derived class "foo" inheriting from Vector, as below:
> require(S4Vect
Hi Aaron,
On 11/15/2015 10:59 AM, Aaron Lun wrote:
Hello all,
I've encountered some unexpected behaviour with some of the base classes
while developing stuff for genomic interactions. The first issue lies
with the subset replacement in the Vector class. Let's say I make a
derived class "foo" in
Hi Herve,
I would have expected GRanges behaviour, where the metadata is affected
by the replacement. For example, with GRanges objects, I often use the
metadata to store statistics or descriptors relevant to each genomic
interval, e.g., peak scores, log-fold changes and so on. If I did a
replacem
Hi Aaron,
On 11/15/2015 12:37 PM, Aaron Lun wrote:
Hi Herve,
I would have expected GRanges behaviour, where the metadata is affected
by the replacement. For example, with GRanges objects, I often use the
metadata to store statistics or descriptors relevant to each genomic
interval, e.g., peak s
Hi Aaron,
On 11/16/2015 09:39 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi Aaron,
On 11/15/2015 12:37 PM, Aaron Lun wrote:
Hi Herve,
I would have expected GRanges behaviour, where the metadata is affected
by the replacement. For example, with GRanges objects, I often use the
metadata to store statistics or desc
Developers,
On 11/16/2015 11:39 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi Aaron,
On 11/16/2015 09:39 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
[...]
Anyway, you convinced me that we should not try to follow too closely
the names model for how we treat metadata columns. If nobody objects,
I'll change the behavior of the various
> -Original Message-
> From: Bioc-devel [mailto:bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of
> Hervé Pagès
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:54 PM
> To: Aaron Lun; bioc-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Unexpected behaviour with Assays and Vector
>
