Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
From: James W. MacDonald <jmac...@uw.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 11:11:07 AM
To: Shepherd, Lori
Cc: Van Twisk, Daniel; bioc-devel; Yu, Guangchuang
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] annotation data not updated?
On Wed, Nov
mp; Bioinformatics
>
> Elm & Carlton Streets
>
> Buffalo, New York 14263
>
> ____
> From: Bioc-devel <bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org> on behalf of James W.
> MacDonald <jmac...@uw.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 7:54
Van Twisk, Daniel
Cc: bioc-devel; Yu, Guangchuang
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] annotation data not updated?
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Van Twisk, Daniel <
daniel.vantw...@roswellpark.org> wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this. New versions of the OrgDbs and Db0s
> (v3.5.0) are no
23
> | ENSOURCENAME: Ensembl
> | ENSOURCEURL: ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/current_fasta
> | UPSOURCENAME: Uniprot
> | UPSOURCEURL: http://www.UniProt.org/
> | UPSOURCEDATE: Tue Nov 7 20:57:02 2017
>
>
>
> From: Bioc-devel <bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org> on beha
ang <g...@connect.hku.hk>
Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 8:40:31 AM
To: bioc-devel
Subject: [Bioc-devel] annotation data not updated?
Dear all,
I just upgraded BioC to 3.6 and found that the data source of org.Hs.eg.db
and GO.db is still half year ago.
I was wondering whether these packa
7:02 2017
From: Bioc-devel <bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org> on behalf of Obenchain,
Valerie <valerie.obench...@roswellpark.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:47:43 PM
To: Yu, Guangchuang; bioc-devel
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] annotation data not updated?
Guangchuang,
Thanks for
Dear all,
I just upgraded BioC to 3.6 and found that the data source of org.Hs.eg.db
and GO.db is still half year ago.
I was wondering whether these packages had been updated in current release.
> org.Hs.eg.db
OrgDb object:
| DBSCHEMAVERSION: 2.1
| Db type: OrgDb
| Supporting package:
