Re: [Biojava-l] ChangeVetoExceptions

2001-07-16 Thread Thomas Down
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:52:38AM +1200, Schreiber, Mark wrote: > > Hi - > > I was wondering if it might be better if ChangeVetoException could be > subclassed from an unchecked exception. > > I know that unchecked exceptions are a contentious issue in java but in many > cases when writing a s

Re: [Biojava-l] ChangeVetoExceptions

2001-07-16 Thread Mark Schreiber
Hi - I generally agree that checked exceptions are safer and for throw away programs I tend to catch exceptions and throw errors but I have recently read a number of articles (mostly in java world) that have called into question the "design flaw" of enforced exception handling. According to thes

RE: [Biojava-l] ChangeVetoExceptions

2001-07-16 Thread Cox, Greg
I agree with your setup in the last paragraph, but I'm not sold on the conclusion. I think that BioJava has enough of a learning curve without untyped exceptions. Yes, I've found empty catch blocks somewhat annoying, but not more than that. I don't see the payoff being worth the effort, in both