Matthew Pocock wrote:
>Feel free to pillage any code from the expression-browser code-base. You
>will find it realy nasty. We should realy start implementing
>MAML-complient APIs. For the data-storage, we should probably use the
>COLT library from Cern as it gives us high-performance matrix maths
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Manuel Simoni wrote:
> Is MAML the (current) last word on microarrays? I feel that getting an
> overview of the emerging standards is pretty hard.
State of the art is MAGEML - microarray/gene expression markup language.
See http://sourceforge.net/projects/mged/
---
BTW, accompanying MAGEML is MAGEOM, an object model on which MAGEML is
based. The team developing MAGEML started from a "platform" (as in
implementation technology) neutral model: MAGEOM and then produced MAGEML as
an instance of it. MAGEOM would be a logical place to start in developing
Java m
Hi -
I have tested and checked in modifications to the Circular API. Notable
changes:
1) It works with the new location schema
2) LocationTools can deal with CircularLocations
3) A new hidden class CircularLocationTools deals with most of the
ugliness
4) CicularSequence is deprecated in favour o
Hi-
I have committed classes for dealing with frames, see Frame, FramedFeature
and SimpleFramedFeature. Also nescessary changes made to FeatureImpl and a
FrameFilter added to FeatureFilter.
GFFEntrySet now also adds FramedFeatures when it annotates a Sequence.
GFFRecords still store frame info a
