[Biojava-l] Bug in assembly behaviour

2002-01-05 Thread David Huen
I have recently updated my copy of the biojava source from CVS after a long code freeze while developing some DAS code and may have detected a problem. There appears to be a fatal bug that arises from a change in the interaction between AssembledSymbolList and SimpleAssembly. >From SimpleAssembly

Re: [Biojava-l] GenBank parsing change

2002-01-05 Thread Scott Markel
Simon, Thanks for trying out the new code. We'll check it in to the BioJava CVS repository. Scott Simon Foote wrote: > > No objections here. > > I made the change, and ran my script that generates a blast database of > all the bacterial proteins in GenBank using the release 127 gbbct files >

[Biojava-l] Re: Bug in assembly behaviour

2002-01-05 Thread Thomas Down
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 03:46:44PM +, David Huen wrote: > > I have changed AssembledSequenceList.length() to return 0 on an empty list > in my own copy. Is this value compatible with other existing code? if > so, I will commit my change to CVS. That should be fine -- thanks. > The other i

[Biojava-l] Somewhat wrongheaded article on Opensource and Bioinformatics

2002-01-05 Thread David Huen
You might want to look at :- http://www.it-analysis.com/article.php?id=1882 and consider supplying a reasoned response to what seems vice-like deathgrip on the wrong end of the stick. Regards, David Huen ___ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Biojava-l] Somewhat wrongheaded article on Opensource andBioinformatics

2002-01-05 Thread Brian Gilman
Is that article even worth posting an opinion? I don't find his reasoning compelling enough to warrant a response. If this had been posted in CNet or bioinform I would be VERY alarmed. -B --- Brian Gilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sr. Software Engineer MIT/