[Biojava-l] DAG-viewer

Hi, I'm modifying DAG-viewer code for my own purposes. It could be easier if I had API-documentation. So does anybody know where to find API-docs for classes used in DAG-Edit? Altavista found references wich referred to www.fruitfly.org pages but the references were old and those pages didn't exi

Re: [Biojava-l] HitSectionSAXParser and BlastLikeVersionSupport

Roy Park wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm trying to write a small program that reads in only the HIT section of > BLAST output (i.e. starting with ">"), by instantiating a > HitSectionSAXParser class, and I noticed that the BlastLikeVersionSupport > variable oVersion needs to be already populated by

[Biojava-l] Dag-edit again

Hi, To be more specific, I'm currently finding the API-documentation and/or sourcecode of class org.bdgp.swing.widget.DataAdapterChooser. If you know where to find it let me know please! -Petri Pehkonen- ___ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Biojava-l] Dag-edit again

Petri Pehkonen wrote: > > Hi, > > To be more specific, I'm currently finding the API-documentation and/or > sourcecode of class org.bdgp.swing.widget.DataAdapterChooser. If you know > where to find it let me know please! Have you tried following the links from bdgp.org perhaps? In general if

Re: [Biojava-l] Announce: BioJava Bootcamp 2002

For anyone who's thinking of attending the bootcamp, the topics we're planning to cover include: - The sequence model Symbols, Strings, and Alphabets Annotated sequences Loading and saving sequences - BioJava for sequence analysis - Accessing databases E

[Biojava-l] Compare Bioperl and Biojava Pls.

Hi Gurus at Biojava, I am trying to find out which one to go for, BioPerl or BioJava? Can someone tell me why there was a need for BioJava ? How is it better/different from BioPerl? Thanks in advance ___ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Biojava-l] Compare Bioperl and Biojava Pls.

Anu Padki wrote: > Hi Gurus at Biojava, > > I am trying to find out which one to go for, BioPerl or BioJava? > > Can someone tell me why there was a need for BioJava ? > How is it better/different from BioPerl? Hi, I'm not sure that "which is better/different BioJava and BioPerl" is necessaril

Re: [Biojava-l] Compare Bioperl and Biojava Pls.

On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Anu Padki wrote: > Hi Gurus at Biojava, > > I am trying to find out which one to go for, BioPerl or BioJava? > > Can someone tell me why there was a need for BioJava ? > How is it better/different from BioPerl? Ha! I am not answering that one ;) Matt... Thomas... Simon, I'd

[Biojava-l] Spelling in Documentation

Hi. Just some simple errors that I think may be spelling related. Apologies for it being this shallow, but I don't know anything about bioinformatics - period. However - I hope these observations prove a little useful. Documentation - Overview. (original) "Hopefuly, as the project matures,

[Biojava-l] WORLDS FIRST Player vs Player Blackjack

  NEW 25 cent tables! Blackjack Shack eliminates the traditional casino House and transfers the House advantage to players. Players compete in one-on-one sessions against each other and never play against the House. Our game is similar to a poker room where the House only se

Re: [Biojava-l] Compare Bioperl and Biojava Pls.

On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Ewan Birney wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Anu Padki wrote: > > > Hi Gurus at Biojava, > > > > I am trying to find out which one to go for, BioPerl or BioJava? > > > > Can someone tell me why there was a need for BioJava ? > > How is it better/different from BioPerl? > > Ha!

[Biojava-l] spam, viral email & info needed for the next Open Bio Foundation newsletter

Hi folks, Sorry for the mass cross-post. I've got a few quick things to mention: (1) The quality of our mailing lists has been degraded both by more instances of spam getting through our filters and the ocasional viral payload sent by Outlook users. The spam problem has been addressed- We ha

Re: [Biojava-l] Compare Bioperl and Biojava Pls.

On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:55:11PM +, David Huen wrote: > > In the interest of universal concord, BioPython and BioRuby should be > considered too though I might have to draw a line at BioC# ;-). It can't > form a valid URL anyway As I suggested at the hackathon, anyone who wants this is

Re: [Biojava-l] Compare Bioperl and Biojava Pls.

On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:45:57AM -0800, Anu Padki wrote: > Hi Gurus at Biojava, > > I am trying to find out which one to go for, BioPerl or BioJava? I'd just like to second Simon's comments on this: both these packages (and BioPython, and BioRuby, for that matter) contain a lot of useful code.

Re: [Biojava-l] Compare Bioperl and Biojava Pls.

Agree. But I do want to emphasize that Perl is much faster to implement for small scale projects. However, that comes at a price. Perl syntax (even with its "use strict" whatever) is much less restrictive, and not only does this make it easier or more annoying to work with, it tends to crea