Re: [Biojava-l] Gene Ontology

2002-12-04 Thread Matthew Pocock
Matthew> OK - so GO is potentialy a DAG, not a tree (for any given Matthew> relation). Can you represent part-whole hierachies Matthew> (i.e. partative with cycles)? No. Its a acyclic (hence DAG!). But the graphs it validates can be cyclic, surely. __

Re: [Biojava-l] Gene Ontology

2002-12-04 Thread Phillip Lord
> "Matthew" == Matthew Pocock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Matthew> OK - so GO is potentialy a DAG, not a tree (for any given Matthew> relation). Can you represent part-whole hierachies Matthew> >> (i.e. partative with cycles)? No. Its a acyclic (hence Matthew> >> DAG!). Matthew> Bu

[Biojava-l] Re: DBSR

2002-12-04 Thread Patrick McConnell
-- Forwarded by Patrick McConnell/CanCtr/mc/Duke on 12/04/2002 02:48 PM --- Patrick McConnell 12/04/2002 02:45 PM To:Biojava-L cc:"Russell Smithies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:Re: DBSR (Document link: Patrick McConnell) We have not pro