Hi Egon!
I am the person who contributed the biojava - structure classes. As it
turns out I am a very happy Jmol user already for quite a while now!
:-)
Using both Biojava and Jmol I am working on a 3D - DAS (distributed
annotation system) client to visualize annotations of proteins in both
s
Andreas Prlic wrote:
Hi Egon!
I am the person who contributed the biojava - structure classes. As it
turns out I am a very happy Jmol user already for quite a while now! :-)
Seconded - Jmol is very cool and surprisingly easy to integrate if you
have PDB format data lying around somewhere in your
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 11:49 am, Tom Oinn wrote:
> Andreas Prlic wrote:
> > I am the person who contributed the biojava - structure classes. As it
> > turns out I am a very happy Jmol user already for quite a while now! :-)
>
> Seconded - Jmol is very cool and surprisingly easy to integrate if
Hello,
I am thinking of using BioJava for managing sequences and annotations of
sequences.
BioJava seems to have database support for storing sequences in
relational databases. How developed is the support for storing annotated
sequences? Is there any documentation (other than JavaDoc) on working
Egon Willighagen wrote:
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 11:49 am, Tom Oinn wrote:
Andreas Prlic wrote:
I am the person who contributed the biojava - structure classes. As it
turns out I am a very happy Jmol user already for quite a while now! :-)
Seconded - Jmol is very cool and surprisingly easy to in
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 01:17 pm, Tom Oinn wrote:
> Having a relatively standard intermediate representation such as PDB
> format flatfiles is generally a good thing and makes it easier to link
> components in a loosely coupled fashion at the expense potentially of
> some efficiency. My thoughts
Hi Egon!
What would be the advantages of using a BioJavaModel Adapter ?
* faster loading of structure into Jmol ?
* fewer memory consumption of application ?
* if you rotate the structure in Jmol, the rotated coordinates are
available through the biojava structure object ?
how about performance
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 02:03 pm, Andreas Prlic wrote:
> Hi Egon!
>
> What would be the advantages of using a BioJavaModel Adapter ?
>
> * faster loading of structure into Jmol ?
> * fewer memory consumption of application ?
Yes, I think so, because one does not need to make a large String firs
I've just started looking at 1.4pre1 (sorry to take so long!).
I am using SequencePanel's to view protein sequences. I add multiple
SequencePanels (each having the same sequence) to a Container with a
BoxLayout. Each displays a different RangeLocation with the overall effect
that the sequence appe
I'm afraid to ask this on the bioperl list for fear of getting flamed, but
I was always under the assumption that bioperl could read and write from a
biosql schema, like I have been doing with biojava for some time.
The bioperl HOWTO docs read
Important
Support for the biosql protocol is disabl
Hi -
You would probably want to use something like BioSQL. There is some
documentation under the OBDA section of this page
http://www.biojava.org/docs/bj_in_anger/index.htm
There are some people on the list who are actively working with this. You
would probably aslo want to look at the BioSQL
11 matches
Mail list logo