On 22.03.2010 07:32 Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote
Don't know if it is optimal, but I can tell you how we do it: Our
routes are generated from the RIPEdb (I won't discuss why not RADB,
I guess you mean prefix filters, not routes. Right?
there are a couple of reasons for that). After the
Dear, Ondrej Zajicek.
Вы писали 20 марта 2010 г., 3:30:42:
diff -uprN bird-1.2.1/proto/ospf/packet.c bird-1.2.1-/proto/ospf/packet.c
--- bird-1.2.1/proto/ospf/packet.c 2010-01-14 11:06:27.0 +0100
+++ bird-1.2.1-/proto/ospf/packet.c 2010-03-19 19:24:47.0 +0100
@@
On Mar 22, 2010, at 09:40 , Arnold Nipper wrote:
On 22.03.2010 08:41 Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote
would it be possible to let bird6 log with the bird6 prefix to syslog
instead of bird? This would make debugging a little easier, as we run
bird and bird6 on the same machine, and it's not too
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:41:16AM +0100, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
Good Morning Ondrej Ondrej,
would it be possible to let bird6 log with the bird6 prefix to syslog
instead of bird?
Good idea. Definitely.
Wouldn't it be better to make the prefix configurable?
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:33:09PM +0100, Ondrej Filip wrote:
On 22.3.2010 15:29, Martin Mares wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:41:16AM +0100, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
Good Morning Ondrej Ondrej,
would it be possible to let bird6 log with the bird6 prefix to syslog
instead of
