On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:04:44AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
BIRD does not use link availability information, therefore if you pull
the cable, BIRD keeps the whole subnet in the router-LSA (if it is
a stub network).
If you do(any plans?), my vote is to leave a host stub in the R-LSA
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:57:29AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ah, now I think I know. The while(buf end) is optimized for
post inc so that is why.
tested little and was surprised, only 3-5% slower with the while loop
compared to my for loop, it is mainly the post increment that does
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/04/26 10:09:36:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:57:29AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ah, now I think I know. The while(buf end) is optimized for
post inc so that is why.
tested little and was surprised, only 3-5% slower with the while
Hello!
while(buf != end) got worse in ppc. gcc 4.3.4 got even more worse
than gcc 3.4.6. I think it is safe to say that gcc 4.3.4 is busted when
it comes to optimization, even on x86. Seen -O1 do better than -O2 for
x86 with gcc 3.4.3.
BTW have you tried unrolling the loops or using
Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org wrote on 2010/04/26 10:33:20:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:49:32AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Haven't seen any action on this patch, forgotten?
http://marc.info/?l=bird-usersm=127200916013140w=2
I missed this patch. Shouldn't autoconf also set
Hello.
There are users out there who do desperately want multipath routing support in
Bird.
Please don't just ignore the need for multipath.
Regards,
Andy.
Securepoint user.
-Original Message-
From: owner-bird-us...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Martin Mares m...@ucw.cz wrote on 2010/04/26 10:31:31:
Hello!
while(buf != end) got worse in ppc. gcc 4.3.4 got even more worse
than gcc 3.4.6. I think it is safe to say that gcc 4.3.4 is busted when
it comes to optimization, even on x86. Seen -O1 do better than -O2 for
x86 with gcc
Andrew Lemin andrew.le...@monitorsoft.com wrote on 2010/04/26 10:46:36:
Hello.
There are users out there who do desperately want multipath routing support
in Bird.
Please don't just ignore the need for multipath.
The SPF work to support that should not be very hard I think, but I have no
I think I mentioned this in passing but the fletcher checksum impl.
is fragile. Try changing u16 length to u32 length and watch it
break for no apparent reason.
Jocke
Hello.
Yes, I believe the changes should not be that difficult.
For example, by simply creating two separate 'RIP protocol' instances which
listen on different external interfaces, I can get bird's internal core routing
table to show all the multiple routing 'options' for common remote subnets
Tried the CLI(birdc) and I am a bit confused as to whait it can do.
I only see this when I press ?:
bird ?
configure [soft] [file]Reload configuration
debug ... Control protocol debugging via
BIRD logs
disable protocol | pattern | all
Andrew Lemin andrew.le...@monitorsoft.com wrote on 2010/04/26 12:14:52:
Hello.
Yes, I believe the changes should not be that difficult.
For example, by simply creating two separate 'RIP protocol' instances which
listen on different external interfaces, I can get bird's internal core
routing
On 26.4.2010 14:26, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Tried the CLI(birdc) and I am a bit confused as to whait it can do.
I only see this when I press ?:
bird ?
configure [soft] [file]Reload configuration
debug ... Control protocol debugging
Hello.
Yes it quite possible that bird does use netlink directly. Regardless I think
the issue is still related to the fact that a multipath route needs to be added
with a single statement and not by adding separate single route statements.
Regarding the error. I cannot say why it is not there,
Ondrej Filip fe...@network.cz wrote on 2010/04/26 14:59:06:
On 26.4.2010 14:26, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Tried the CLI(birdc) and I am a bit confused as to whait it can do.
I only see this when I press ?:
bird ?
configure [soft] [file]Reload configuration
debug ...
Arnold Nipper arn...@nipper.de wrote on 2010/04/26 17:40:51:
On 26.04.2010 17:06 Joakim Tjernlund wrote
OK, but it would be handy if I could config log files from there.
BIRD is like a racing car whereas you are talking about a Mercedes-Benz
S-type ... you see the difference?
:)
Wolfgang Hennerbichler píše v Po 26. 04. 2010 v 17:55 +0200:
On 4/26/10 5:50 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Arnold Nipperarn...@nipper.de wrote on 2010/04/26 17:40:51:
On 26.04.2010 17:06 Joakim Tjernlund wrote
OK, but it would be handy if I could config log files from there.
BIRD
On 26.4.2010 17:50, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Arnold Nipper arn...@nipper.de wrote on 2010/04/26 17:40:51:
On 26.04.2010 17:06 Joakim Tjernlund wrote
OK, but it would be handy if I could config log files from there.
BIRD is like a racing car whereas you are talking about a
Ondrej Filip fe...@network.cz wrote on 2010/04/26 20:25:19:
On 26.4.2010 18:34, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On 26.4.2010 17:50, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Arnold Nipper arn...@nipper.de wrote on 2010/04/26 17:40:51:
On 26.04.2010 17:06 Joakim Tjernlund wrote
OK, but it would be handy if I
Ondrej Filip fe...@network.cz wrote on 2010/04/26 17:40:57:
On 25.4.2010 23:40, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Martin Mares m...@ucw.cz wrote on 2010/04/25 23:33:49:
Some archs(RISC like archs) can do pre increment and load
in one insn but gcc optimization often fails to take advantage
of
20 matches
Mail list logo
