Re: bird 1.3.7 setting incorrect nexthop on FreeBSD

2012-08-30 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:30:00PM +0300, ?? ?? wrote: > Hello there, people! > I have a strange moment with bird's behaviour on FreeBSD 9.0-RC3 > (FreeBSD 9.0-RC3 i386 GENERIC): > It establishes BGP sessions, succesfully exchanges routes and when > exporting them to kernel

bird 1.3.8 vs 1.3.6

2012-08-30 Thread fredrik danerklint
Hi! Is there something with these versions that is not compatibly with each other for the ospf to work in ipv6? Right now I have a bird 1.3.8 instance neither announce nor getting an routes in a area. It is stuck in the exchange state. The ip4 versions also get stuck in the loading state fo

Re: BIRD v1.3.8 - some notes and hamradio requests

2012-08-30 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Gustavo Ponza wrote: > Eureka! that patch *definitively* solved the above problem, too :) > The BIRD behavior is now *perfectly* equal to that of quagga and > the Mikrotik and so, for me, no other limitations to run exclusively > the BIRD program. > Then, t

Re: bird and OSPF on p2p

2012-08-30 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Ondrej Zajicek wrote on 2012/08/30 15:49:53: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:33:09PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > 3) I thought that for some reasons the ifindex in 'data' value of link in > > > router LSA is somehow important in link-back check or next-hop calculation > > > when there are p

Re: bird and OSPF on p2p

2012-08-30 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Ondrej Zajicek wrote on 2012/08/30 15:42:50: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:33:09PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > Therefore, i think about putting local IP address for ptp links with ptp > > > addresses (i.e. merging the patch i sent before). Although it could be > > > argued that it is con

Re: bird and OSPF on p2p

2012-08-30 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:33:09PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > 3) I thought that for some reasons the ifindex in 'data' value of link in > > router LSA is somehow important in link-back check or next-hop calculation > > when there are parallel links, but it seems to be completely useless > >

Re: bird and OSPF on p2p

2012-08-30 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:33:09PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Therefore, i think about putting local IP address for ptp links with ptp > > addresses (i.e. merging the patch i sent before). Although it could be > > argued that it is contrary to RFC 2328 12.4.1 [*], the ifindex value > > is u

Re: bird and OSPF on p2p

2012-08-30 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Ondrej Zajicek wrote on 2012/08/30 12:57:30: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:32:26PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > owner-bird-us...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz wrote on 2012/08/22 15:34:54: > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:32:24PM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > >

Re: bird and OSPF on p2p

2012-08-30 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hi. On 30.08.2012 17:09, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: It can be conditional on a configurable option, that should provide maximum forward compatibility. I have no idea about Mikrotik, but we could work with quagga to get it fixed there as well... That would be just great, as for now it's

Re: bird and OSPF on p2p

2012-08-30 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > Therefore, i think about putting local IP address for ptp links with ptp > addresses (i.e. merging the patch i sent before). Although it could be > argued that it is contrary to RFC 2328 12.4.1 [*], the ifindex value > is useless and using local IP addre

Re: bird and OSPF on p2p

2012-08-30 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:32:26PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > owner-bird-us...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz wrote on 2012/08/22 15:34:54: > > > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:32:24PM +0600, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > On 22.08.2012 14:39, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > > >> As i unders