RE: BGP: AS private number check

2018-06-14 Thread Arvin Gan
Hi , Bird support the configuration of efault bgp_local_pref. In export filter, this attribute can also be reconfigure. default bgp_local_pref number A default value for the Local Preference attribute. It is used when a new Local Preference attribute is attached to a route by the BGP protocol

Recall: BGP: AS private number check

2018-06-14 Thread Arvin Gan
Arvin Gan would like to recall the message, "BGP: AS private number check ".

Recall: BGP: AS private number check

2018-06-14 Thread Arvin Gan
Arvin Gan would like to recall the message, "BGP: AS private number check ".

Re: BGP: AS private number check

2018-06-14 Thread zilhazur . rahman
Hi everyone Could you assist me how can I use local preference in BGP in Bird for traffic manipulation ? Regards Zilhaz From: "Arvin Gan" To: bird-users@network.cz Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 12:13:59 PM Subject: BGP: AS private number check Hi All, According to RFC1930, the AS n

RE: BGP: AS private number check

2018-06-14 Thread Arvin Gan
Hi all, Sorry, my understand is incorrect, can ignore the mail. Thanks Arvin From: Arvin Gan Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 2:14 PM To: bird-users@network.cz Subject: BGP: AS private number check Hi All, According to RFC1930, the AS number 64512 to 65535 are reserved for private, I can

BGP: AS private number check

2018-06-14 Thread Arvin Gan
Hi All, According to RFC1930, the AS number 64512 to 65535 are reserved for private, I cannot find the implementation for checking private AS number in BIRD, anybody know it or it's lost in BGP ? RFC1930 10. Reserved AS Numbers

Re: BGP Connection reset on fast timers

2018-06-14 Thread dave seddon
Packet 35 shows .13, which is the Bird running on Vmware (sorry about that), and clearly thinks the hold time expired: Major error Code: Hold Timer Expired (4) Minor error Code (Hold Timer Expired): 0 Might be worth trying to run bird debugging to see what else it says. Have you consider BFD? May

Re: BIRD - Config Support for RFC 3107 - Carrying Label Information in BGP

2018-06-14 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 06:13:57PM +, Thiruvazhiyan Lakshmanan wrote: > Thanks Ondrej, > > With your suggested changes, I notice both Kernel and BGP uses single > table (master4) and both have the routes. However, the routes shown in > the bird has labels attached to them, the routes shown in

Re: BIRD - Config Support for RFC 3107 - Carrying Label Information in BGP

2018-06-14 Thread Jan Maria Matejka
There are switches in the code to drop MPLS labels when the kernel doesn't support it. If you run $ grep '^#define HAVE_MPLS_KERNEL' config.log (config.log is a product of ./configure) it should show that it is defined to 1. If not, try running ./configure to check whether it shows you Kernel MPL

RE: BIRD - Config Support for RFC 3107 - Carrying Label Information in BGP

2018-06-14 Thread Thiruvazhiyan Lakshmanan
Thanks Ondrej, With your suggested changes, I notice both Kernel and BGP uses single table (master4) and both have the routes. However, the routes shown in the bird has labels attached to them, the routes shown in Kernel table do not show the labels to them. bird> show route Table master4:

Re: BIRD - Config Support for RFC 3107 - Carrying Label Information in BGP

2018-06-14 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:33:56PM +, Thiruvazhiyan Lakshmanan wrote: > Hi Ondrej, > > Thanks for your reply. I have upgraded the kernel on my VM and now I am > getting the 3107 routes in the mtab4 table in the bird. But the routes are > not programed to mpls Kernel table. Maybe I am missing

Re: BIRD router/route server functions

2018-06-14 Thread Jan Maria Matejka
On host A, run: nc 179 <<<"any data you make out from thin air" It should make at least a (failed) log entry on the other side. If not, there is still something rotten in the iptables. Are you really able to ping the other side? Don't you have more than one interface in the same network segment

Re: BIRD router/route server functions

2018-06-14 Thread Isaac HO
the Error: Last error: Socket: No route to host To added this rule on both routers' iptables: ACCEPT tcp -- 192.168.199.0/24 anywhere tcp dpt:bgp upgrade the version birdc show protocols BIRD 1.6.4 ready. name prototablestate since info kernel1 Ker