On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 19:33 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:40:04PM +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > I think the standard just does not consider the case of 'unnumbered'
> > > link with both local and remote address but without subnet and assumes
> > > 'real'
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:40:04PM +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > I think the standard just does not consider the case of 'unnumbered'
> > link with both local and remote address but without subnet and assumes
> > 'real' unnumbered PtP link with no local IP address associated with
> > the
On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 14:09 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is safe.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:28:46AM +, Kenth Eriksson
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:28:46AM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> > The second case is more complex. In OSPFv2, it always does not
> > propagate
> > /32 local addresses and it propagates /32 peer addresses only if
> > configured as stub. In OSPFv3, this is not implemented and neither
> > local
> >
On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 13:55 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
> and know the content is safe.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:56:24PM +, Kenth Eriksson
